Best team for newer players?

For Fantasy Football related chat that doesn't come under any of other forum categories.

Moderator: TFF Mods

User avatar
Sword of Solkan
Experienced
Experienced
Posts: 63
Joined: Tue Oct 07, 2014 11:35 am
Location: London

Re: Best team for newer players?

Post by Sword of Solkan »

Cheers, guys. I'll probably go with Orcs.
Heff wrote: I would say orcs, that being said the new players with orcs last year were caned round my way.
Out of interest, what went wrong for them?
Digger Goreman wrote: Still, orcs are more fun and not as badly unbalanced as the list in my sig.....
At the risk of opening a can of worms a wiser man would pass by: Slann really aren't unbalanced.

The NAF statistics show them ranked 14th of the 24 teams, only winning 37% of their games (and losing 44%): http://naf.talkfantasyfootball.org/lrb6.html.

Tom Anders intentionally designed them as a less competitive team.

Reason: ''
The Audacity of Hop [Slann] - 3/1/1 (W/L/D)
Chris
Legend
Legend
Posts: 2035
Joined: Thu May 29, 2003 1:18 pm
Location: London, England

Re: Best team for newer players?

Post by Chris »

Sword of Solkan wrote:Out of interest, what went wrong for them?
Normally it is speed. You get out of position, or grind forward too slowly, etc. Undead have a higher sucess rate at tournies because of the greater speed (with the ghouls) and ability to outbash in key areas (with the two mummies). The Orcs do get a thrower, but he is a bit slow.
Both teams can have a fun starting line up though, my favourite with Orcs is a troll, goblin, thrower, 4 blitzers and 4 black orcs.

Reason: ''
User avatar
Digger Goreman
Legend
Legend
Posts: 5000
Joined: Sun Jun 25, 2006 3:30 am
Location: Atlanta, GA., USA: Recruiting the Walking Dead for the Blood Bowl Zombie Nation
Contact:

Re: Best team for newer players?

Post by Digger Goreman »

Sword of Solkan wrote:
At the risk of opening a can of worms a wiser man would pass by: Slann really aren't unbalanced.

The NAF statistics show them ranked 14th of the 24 teams, only winning 37% of their games (and losing 44%): http://naf.talkfantasyfootball.org/lrb6.html.

Tom Anders intentionally designed them as a less competitive team.
I will make it short and as non-acrimonious as possible: Slann (aka green elves and spam) were a rush inclusion job to get in the three teams while greedy w@nkers were acting aggressively stupid and shotgunning at everyone with their lawyers.... I am a big fan of Tom's AND I don't agree with everything he does.... If this turkey can roost at his door, I will believe he tried, and the team suffers from common design failure in the gw-bb milieu: starting Ag4 on any player, spam skill (and the most broken one at that), more than two of any positional, easy access to blodgers, combo of skill/trait that can only fail on 2+ (the NEO/Matrix syndrome: waiting on the one....)

And citing sNAFu is futile....

Reason: ''
LRB6/Icepelt Edition: Ah!, when Blood Bowl made sense....
"1 in 36, my Nuffled arse!"
User avatar
Don__Vito
Legend
Legend
Posts: 1907
Joined: Sun Jul 16, 2006 7:43 pm
Location: Getting to the chopper!

Re: Best team for newer players?

Post by Don__Vito »

Change the broken record Digger. I am so, so sick of seeing your rants nowadays. Seriously.

Reason: ''
Image
User avatar
Sword of Solkan
Experienced
Experienced
Posts: 63
Joined: Tue Oct 07, 2014 11:35 am
Location: London

Re: Best team for newer players?

Post by Sword of Solkan »

Digger Goreman wrote: And citing sNAFu is futile....
We’re talking about a survey of more than 2,000 matches, which shows that Slann teams lose considerably more games than they win. That’s the opposite of an overpowered team.

Do you have any evidence that the Slann win more games they lose?

Reason: ''
The Audacity of Hop [Slann] - 3/1/1 (W/L/D)
dode74
Ex-Cyanide/Focus toadie
Posts: 2565
Joined: Fri Jul 24, 2009 4:55 pm
Location: Near Reading, UK

Re: Best team for newer players?

Post by dode74 »

Data from two sources (FUMBBL and the one Cyanide league I know which can and does use "Slann", OFL) suggests that the team is performing pretty much as expected.

Reason: ''
Dr. Von Richten
Super Star
Super Star
Posts: 876
Joined: Thu Sep 29, 2011 9:46 pm

Re: Best team for newer players?

Post by Dr. Von Richten »

Don__Vito wrote:Change the broken record Digger. I am so, so sick of seeing your rants nowadays. Seriously.
To be fair, he was responding to a direct question ... which just means we shouldn't ever ask Digger any question he can use to launch into his Trololololing about over half the teams being unbalanced and all that bullsh*t.

Reason: ''
Olaf the Stout
Star Player
Star Player
Posts: 728
Joined: Fri May 23, 2008 5:26 am
Location: Adelaide, Australia

Re: Best team for newer players?

Post by Olaf the Stout »

Digger Goreman wrote:
Sword of Solkan wrote:
At the risk of opening a can of worms a wiser man would pass by: Slann really aren't unbalanced.

The NAF statistics show them ranked 14th of the 24 teams, only winning 37% of their games (and losing 44%): http://naf.talkfantasyfootball.org/lrb6.html.

Tom Anders intentionally designed them as a less competitive team.
I will make it short and as non-acrimonious as possible: Slann (aka green elves and spam) were a rush inclusion job to get in the three teams while greedy w@nkers were acting aggressively stupid and shotgunning at everyone with their lawyers.... I am a big fan of Tom's AND I don't agree with everything he does.... If this turkey can roost at his door, I will believe he tried, and the team suffers from common design failure in the gw-bb milieu: starting Ag4 on any player, spam skill (and the most broken one at that), more than two of any positional, easy access to blodgers, combo of skill/trait that can only fail on 2+ (the NEO/Matrix syndrome: waiting on the one....)

And citing sNAFu is futile....
I don't get it? I've never heard anyone regard Slaan as overpowered. FUMBBL stats suggest they lose more than they win. So how are they broken?

Reason: ''
Image
User avatar
sann0638
Kommissar Enthusiasmoff
Posts: 6626
Joined: Mon May 08, 2006 10:24 am
Location: Swindon, England

Re: Best team for newer players?

Post by sann0638 »

Stop it people! Don't give him the platform!

Reason: ''
NAF Ex-President
Founder of SAWBBL, Swindon and Wiltshire's BB League - find us on Facebook and Discord
NAF Data wrangler
User avatar
Digger Goreman
Legend
Legend
Posts: 5000
Joined: Sun Jun 25, 2006 3:30 am
Location: Atlanta, GA., USA: Recruiting the Walking Dead for the Blood Bowl Zombie Nation
Contact:

Re: Best team for newer players?

Post by Digger Goreman »

Total meeting of Ronalds.... :roll:

Reason: ''
LRB6/Icepelt Edition: Ah!, when Blood Bowl made sense....
"1 in 36, my Nuffled arse!"
User avatar
Heff
Dwarf fetishist
Posts: 2843
Joined: Sat May 30, 2009 5:53 pm
Location: Where the Dwarf Hate is

Re: Best team for newer players?

Post by Heff »

Basically it was what Chris said, poor positioning. That and meeting my monster werewolf :lol:

Reason: ''
Heff...Keeping the Dwarf (and lego) hate alive
If you cannot stall out for an 8 turn drive to score with dwarves then you need to go and play canasta with your dad..if you can find him.
Image
Dr. Von Richten
Super Star
Super Star
Posts: 876
Joined: Thu Sep 29, 2011 9:46 pm

Re: Best team for newer players?

Post by Dr. Von Richten »

Olaf the Stout wrote: I don't get it? I've never heard anyone regard Slaan as overpowered. FUMBBL stats suggest they lose more than they win. So how are they broken?
Don't even bother trying. When it comes to this, Digger is either a Troll or insane (I'm not yet sure which), so it's no use probing for a rational argument that just isn't there.

Reason: ''
Olaf the Stout
Star Player
Star Player
Posts: 728
Joined: Fri May 23, 2008 5:26 am
Location: Adelaide, Australia

Re: Best team for newer players?

Post by Olaf the Stout »

Dr. Von Richten wrote:
Olaf the Stout wrote: I don't get it? I've never heard anyone regard Slaan as overpowered. FUMBBL stats suggest they lose more than they win. So how are they broken?
Don't even bother trying. When it comes to this, Digger is either a Troll or insane (I'm not yet sure which), so it's no use probing for a rational argument that just isn't there.
Fair enough. Hadn't encountered his arguments about this before.

Reason: ''
Image
User avatar
Digger Goreman
Legend
Legend
Posts: 5000
Joined: Sun Jun 25, 2006 3:30 am
Location: Atlanta, GA., USA: Recruiting the Walking Dead for the Blood Bowl Zombie Nation
Contact:

Re: Best team for newer players?

Post by Digger Goreman »

Dr. Von Richten wrote: Don't even bother trying. When it comes to this, Digger is either a Troll or insane (I'm not yet sure which), so it's no use probing for a rational argument that just isn't there.
The third possibility is that there is merit past "is" and "is not" of purportive numbers without empirical assumptions... and your attitude of "what supports my assumptions" is right....

Ad hominen attacks and I am the troll?!

I proscribe a daily mental hygiene regimen of 1 hour of meditation, morning and evening, for the psychosis... and best wishes for your recovery.... :D

Reason: ''
LRB6/Icepelt Edition: Ah!, when Blood Bowl made sense....
"1 in 36, my Nuffled arse!"
voyagers_uk
Da Cynic
Posts: 7462
Joined: Thu Jan 01, 1970 12:00 am
Location: Nice Red Uniforms and Fanatical devotion to the Pope!

Best team for newer players?

Post by voyagers_uk »

Back to the earlier question from Sword, orcs are probably the smart move but (sorry Digger) dark elves give you the best chance to run against both styles. You have played slaan and have seen low AV hit hard so AV 8 is better and AG 4 with some Frenzy is amazing. Best of luck and roll high!

On the Slaan topic, my only regret was that their creation saw pro elves lose leap from their catchers. That was a little much. I got tired of the "but Slaan are the leapers, they are frogs" arguments, kind of like saying Chaos are the only team who should be called chaos

Reason: ''
Image
Ikterus wrote: But for the record, play Voyagers_UK if you have the chance. He's cursed! :P
Post Reply