RogueThirteen wrote:The last thing 40k needs is halflings. Ratling snipers are more than enough.

I like.
Moderator: TFF Mods
RogueThirteen wrote:The last thing 40k needs is halflings. Ratling snipers are more than enough.
This.Valen wrote:I really dont get thios idea that all teams must balance, screw it, I love that there are some sucky teams out there, adds to the flavour
And I salute you for itI really dont get thios idea that all teams must balance, screw it, I love that there are some sucky teams out there, adds to the flavour
+1valen wrote:I really dont get thios idea that all teams must balance, screw it, I love that there are some sucky teams out there, adds to the flavour
There's the problem.plasmoid wrote: Oh, and to explain why I'm personally leaning the other way:
In the MBBL, which is a pretty competitive league,
Fair enough. At least it's not an uncommon problem.There's the problem
I do not wish to make all teams equal. I wish to make them less un-equal. Not the same thing.I really dont get thios idea that all teams must balance
I would understand if the focus was then looking at the teams that have very low representation, but halflings are more popular than 9 other teams (including Chaos and High Elves) so would not appear to be a high priority. Given they are intentionally worse than other teams I'd say they amount of games played with them is about right.plasmoid wrote:I'd love it if there was more of an even team spread in events such as the world cup.
and I voted that one i think, but I wasn't being entirely seriousAfroman wrote: PS: I'm very interested in hearing the arguments of those who voted "Above Tier 1"
0-2 Halfling Baker 6/2/3/6 Dodge, Stunty, Right Stuff, Custard Pie, Sneaky Git A/GSP 60kDoubleSkulls wrote:I agree with PurpleGoo - if you are looking for house rules to make things more balanced then more fun is better. Perhaps having a 0-2 "Chef" positional that start with Dauntless and +AV for instance, or has a "Custard Pie weapon" (which works exactly like Hypnotic Gaze).
And Afroman said:They would be no longer allowed in the stunty cup awards anyway, compared to the other stunties they would rule.
Well, you're both assuming I'm not buffing the other tier 3 teams...Make the suggested change and they will completely rule the bottom tier.
I agree that they are spot on for their intention.Given they are intentionally worse than other teams I'd say they amount of games played with them is about right.
I'm after fun.I agree with PurpleGoo - if you are looking for house rules to make things more balanced then more fun is better.
Not a bad ideawhy not just add them as an 0-4 positional.... minor impact, added flavour
Ah Garion, I see you're brought up in the FUMBBL traditionand I voted that one i think, but I wasn't being entirely serious