plasmoid wrote:Hi Dwarfcoach.
IMO, what you stated is a "creative reading" not a "strict reading".
I mean, can you point to anywhere where it states something like "automatically fails the landing roll"?
What the LRB does state is: "If they land on top of another player then both the and the other player is
knocked over...."
It doesn't say you automatically fail an imaginary landing roll.
On the other hand "knocked over" is covered by the rules for turnovers.
Martin
Hi Plas,
The main reason for the wide spread confusion towards this rule is the weird part of rules/gaming which I tend to term as the
' Oh, but that is common sense/obvious...'
...syndrome.
The rules leave alot for the reader to fill in themselves, they are not A->B->C->D letter of the alphabet style stuff.
Then add in a couple of very dubious translations of said rules (just to help matters) and what do you have? Well some 'not very harmonious' games....
I have my own very clear cut ideas but have refrained from airing them (maybe a NAF thing, I dunno) but I posted this here to so I could find out what the general populace thinks..............
*Mr. T pities the fool. Chuck Norris rips the fool's head off. *
