Stalling Part II
- Cooper
- Emerging Star
- Posts: 459
- Joined: Mon Feb 03, 2003 1:16 pm
Stalling Part II
I was thinking about it some more...
what do you think about this reasoning:
Someone knows the tactic off stalling and playing "with the clock"
It is 0-0 and he is certain of scoring in the 4th turn of the second half.
He can stall without a problem (hypothetical 2 players against, 5 reserves, 9 KO)
I will argue that it is unsportsmanlike and forgery of competition if you do NOT stall.
I think when in competition people should allways play to win, and when they are willingly taking actions that will decrease their chances of winning they are cheating on the rest of the league.
Ofcourse this will be very hard to prove, since you can say that he is playing for more spp's and is certain of himself that he will win it anyway...
what do you think?
what do you think about this reasoning:
Someone knows the tactic off stalling and playing "with the clock"
It is 0-0 and he is certain of scoring in the 4th turn of the second half.
He can stall without a problem (hypothetical 2 players against, 5 reserves, 9 KO)
I will argue that it is unsportsmanlike and forgery of competition if you do NOT stall.
I think when in competition people should allways play to win, and when they are willingly taking actions that will decrease their chances of winning they are cheating on the rest of the league.
Ofcourse this will be very hard to prove, since you can say that he is playing for more spp's and is certain of himself that he will win it anyway...
what do you think?
Reason: ''
Crusader against all odds.
W
W
- MistWraith
- Emerging Star
- Posts: 501
- Joined: Sun Nov 03, 2002 11:59 pm
- Location: Springfield, MO
Stalling is irrelevant to sportsmanship.
It may be bad coaching to stall (or not), but it has no reflection on how much of a sportsman you are.
Much like using a one turn touchdown has no relation to how sportsman like you are.
It may be bad coaching to stall (or not), but it has no reflection on how much of a sportsman you are.
Much like using a one turn touchdown has no relation to how sportsman like you are.
Reason: ''
Blood Bowl is WFB Football, not Football with a bit of generic fantasy garbage thrown in!
- Cooper
- Emerging Star
- Posts: 459
- Joined: Mon Feb 03, 2003 1:16 pm
I will clarify myself a bit.
In my opinion a coach should do everything (on the field ofcourse) to win.
Not only will i do that, but i expect the same from my opponents.
I think games in general are more fun when everyone is playing to win.
One of the tactics that will help you win, is stalling.
If you know this tactic and it would give you the game for certain, but you choose not to use it and choose a weaker tactics i feel you are throwing the game. This would be unsportsmanlike.
( i play a lot of vampire, so my perspective is maybe a bit too harsh...for those who don't know it, it is a 5-player game, and if YOU play bad, the person sitting left of you will win, and the rest of the table subsequently looses)
I know this is less the case with 2-player games, but by not playing your best you will pollute the outcomes of tournaments/leagues.
For myself i know i don't like it, if i win a game because my opponent chose to give me the chance...if i win, i want to win on my own...
W
In my opinion a coach should do everything (on the field ofcourse) to win.
Not only will i do that, but i expect the same from my opponents.
I think games in general are more fun when everyone is playing to win.
One of the tactics that will help you win, is stalling.
If you know this tactic and it would give you the game for certain, but you choose not to use it and choose a weaker tactics i feel you are throwing the game. This would be unsportsmanlike.
( i play a lot of vampire, so my perspective is maybe a bit too harsh...for those who don't know it, it is a 5-player game, and if YOU play bad, the person sitting left of you will win, and the rest of the table subsequently looses)
I know this is less the case with 2-player games, but by not playing your best you will pollute the outcomes of tournaments/leagues.
For myself i know i don't like it, if i win a game because my opponent chose to give me the chance...if i win, i want to win on my own...
W
Reason: ''
Crusader against all odds.
W
W
- Zombie
- Legend
- Posts: 2245
- Joined: Tue Aug 13, 2002 4:07 pm
- Location: Montreal, Quebec, Canada
-
- Legend
- Posts: 6757
- Joined: Fri Aug 30, 2002 1:55 pm
- Location: Retired from TBB
That's a knee-jerk reaction.
If he's giving you a chance, you didn't win. That's true true even if you do clear your balls first. What he's doing is giving you the opportunity to keep playing, both of you still having fun in the process. If you're paying for games at the bar, I'd be highly pissed if you pulled a stunt like that. You need to quit looking at it like charity and more like opportunity.
If he's giving you a chance, you didn't win. That's true true even if you do clear your balls first. What he's doing is giving you the opportunity to keep playing, both of you still having fun in the process. If you're paying for games at the bar, I'd be highly pissed if you pulled a stunt like that. You need to quit looking at it like charity and more like opportunity.
Reason: ''
Have fun!
- grep-v
- Veteran
- Posts: 199
- Joined: Mon Jan 13, 2003 12:31 pm
- Location: Munich, Bavaria, Germany
Re: Stalling Part II
Sorry, but this is crap.Cooper wrote:It is 0-0 and he is certain of scoring in the 4th turn of the second half.
He can stall without a problem (hypothetical 2 players against, 5 reserves, 9 KO)
I will argue that it is unsportsmanlike and forgery of competition if you do NOT stalll.

You could always go for another TD just to prove your excellence, humiliate your opponent or (perhaps

Reason: ''
Detect + Neutralize + Eliminate = Win
-
- Da Collector
- Posts: 3760
- Joined: Thu Jan 02, 2003 4:27 pm
I agree on this. For him it must be boring to win without any effort, as it feels embarassing for you to realize that you normally won't stand a chance. Nevertheless, you met for playing pool and having a good time. It won't feel fake for him when he gives you a chance and it evolves a close match, nor you should undervalue the chance to try harder as you might beat him now. At the end, both of you will have a better time at the ned than the other way round.snotsngrots wrote:That's a knee-jerk reaction.
If he's giving you a chance, you didn't win. That's true true even if you do clear your balls first. What he's doing is giving you the opportunity to keep playing, both of you still having fun in the process. If you're paying for games at the bar, I'd be highly pissed if you pulled a stunt like that. You need to quit looking at it like charity and more like opportunity.
Reason: ''
- Zombie
- Legend
- Posts: 2245
- Joined: Tue Aug 13, 2002 4:07 pm
- Location: Montreal, Quebec, Canada
I will never have a good time when my opponent deliberately gives me a chance. That's when i have the worst time ever. I prefer losing 10 games in a row rather than winning the 10th game because my opponent gave me a chance. I'm very competitive in everything i do, and there's nothing i hate more than a thrown game.
For the record, he's not really better at pool than i am. I usually beat him at the table where we play in Sherbrooke (where we study) because i know that table better, and he usually beats me at the table where we play now in Montreal (where we work for the summer) because he knows that table better.
For the record, he's not really better at pool than i am. I usually beat him at the table where we play in Sherbrooke (where we study) because i know that table better, and he usually beats me at the table where we play now in Montreal (where we work for the summer) because he knows that table better.
Reason: ''
- Longshot
- Da Capt'ain
- Posts: 3279
- Joined: Thu Aug 09, 2001 12:00 am
- Location: elsewhere
- Contact:
-
- Legend
- Posts: 6757
- Joined: Fri Aug 30, 2002 1:55 pm
- Location: Retired from TBB
You must be less fun to be around in person than you are here.Zombie wrote:I will never have a good time when my opponent deliberately gives me a chance. That's when i have the worst time ever. I prefer losing 10 games in a row rather than winning the 10th game because my opponent gave me a chance. I'm very competitive in everything i do, and there's nothing i hate more than a thrown game.
For the record, he's not really better at pool than i am. I usually beat him at the table where we play in Sherbrooke (where we study) because i know that table better, and he usually beats me at the table where we play now in Montreal (where we work for the summer) because he knows that table better.
Reason: ''
Have fun!
- Cooper
- Emerging Star
- Posts: 459
- Joined: Mon Feb 03, 2003 1:16 pm
Well, i am close to your reasoning...but i want to lessen it somewhat...Zombie wrote:I will never have a good time when my opponent deliberately gives me a chance. That's when i have the worst time ever. I prefer losing 10 games in a row rather than winning the 10th game because my opponent gave me a chance. I'm very competitive in everything i do, and there's nothing i hate more than a thrown game.
.
I can certainly have a good TIME, when someone deliberately gives me a chance, i just won't be having a good game. When playing with friends i am allways (well mostofthetime) having a good time, but i am not allways having a good game.
W
Reason: ''
Crusader against all odds.
W
W