Proposal to vote on adding Khorne and Brets to NAF database

[Darkson]

No.

#1 - they're available
#2 - they're there but not available
#3 - they're not there

#3 is further away than #2, and further still from #1.

That's not bias, that's fact that you've confirmed.

Using your "it's not in the database but could be" 'logic' then you could argue for any team to be added, as any team "is not in the database but could be".

If there's any bias showing its yours.

[dode74]

Ok, Darkson, if you say so - the fact that you won't even recognise your conclusion is due to your bias is the sad bit.

You'll have noted that I've not stated an opinion on the matter either way due to lack of evidence (I don't have all the facts available, and you certainly don't), which puts paid to your sad little "you too" argument. Feel free to wallow in your grouchy dustbin of self-pity though

[Baxx]

Good news! More teams = more fun.

[frogboy]

I was a bit against these new teams at first, mainly because personally I think the NAF should follow GW now but when I thought about it again I realised I was just being selfish, and my reasons for not liking them were based on my own views of what a Khorne team should look like, rather than what other people wanted to play.

I'm not against new teams and hope to welcome these ones to my tournement next year (check out my Signature).

Cheers,
frogboy

[Rolex]

When these teams became official in January, we are REALLY going to need an updated version of score, that includes them.

Is this in the works? I have been asked already.

[Darkson]

Takes about 30 seconds to add them (once the way it's spelt in the NAF database is known), just change the race.ini file (I think it's called).

[sann0638]

The version of score on thenaf.net already includes them.

[Pipey]

I can confirm it works (set up for UKTC inc K&B appears to be working well).