Necromantic vs Undead

Minigiant · Post by **Minigiant** » Thu Apr 09, 2015 10:35 am

What is considered to be the more competitive of the two main undead teams?

Necromantic or Undead?

Post by **lunchmoney** » Thu Apr 09, 2015 10:42 am

In what environment?
6 game tourney with or without skills? High or low TV?
League? Short or long?
Perpetual league?
Online Matchmaking?

Minigiant · Post by **Minigiant** » Thu Apr 09, 2015 10:59 am

lunchmoney wrote:In what environment?
6 game tourney with or without skills? High or low TV?
League? Short or long?
Perpetual league?
Online Matchmaking?

6 game tourney, with skills

Post by **Loki** » Thu Apr 09, 2015 11:00 am

Undead

el Superbeasto · Post by **el Superbeasto** » Thu Apr 09, 2015 11:13 am

Undead.
Necromantic is more fun, though.

Minigiant · Post by **Minigiant** » Thu Apr 09, 2015 11:21 am

el Superbeasto wrote:Undead.
Necromantic is more fun, though.

What conditions are Necromantic more competitive?

pixmen · Post by **pixmen** » Thu Apr 09, 2015 11:44 am

Long league

el Superbeasto · Post by **el Superbeasto** » Thu Apr 09, 2015 1:40 pm

I just find them more fun/versatile due to the werewolves.

Digger Goreman · Post by **Digger Goreman** » Thu Apr 09, 2015 4:28 pm

Undead are a strongly mini-maxed right out of the box and, due to MiB, the only solid competitor to the fairy teams.... However, if you can get block/blodge + MiB werewolves, Necros can be fun....

nonumber · Post by **nonumber** » Fri Apr 10, 2015 10:54 am

I always found Undead one of the most redonk teams out of the box. Two big guys with NO negatraits, four quick ball carriers with instant blodge access, and a whole bunch of capable road blocks in between. Regeneration and enough gp left over to bathe yourself in re rolls. They're quicker than Dwarfs and bashier than Wood Elves. Undead and Wood Elves I would say just off the top of my head are the two races I've seen win tournaments generally more often than any others.

besters · Post by **besters** » Fri Apr 10, 2015 12:22 pm

Minigiant wrote:
el Superbeasto wrote:Undead.
Necromantic is more fun, though.
What conditions are Necromantic more competitive?

Necro's are more fun and with higher t.v. / higher number of skill choices narrow the gap in competitiveness.

Digger Goreman · Post by **Digger Goreman** » Fri Apr 10, 2015 12:42 pm

nonumber wrote:Undead and Wood Elves I would say just off the top of my head are the two races I've seen win tournaments generally more often than any others.

Word of Truth....

Fassbinder75 · Post by **Fassbinder75** » Sun Apr 12, 2015 7:50 am

Digger Goreman wrote:
nonumber wrote:Undead and Wood Elves I would say just off the top of my head are the two races I've seen win tournaments generally more often than any others.
Word of Truth....

Yes. They are the two best races in win% according to NAF.

Digger Goreman · Post by **Digger Goreman** » Sun Apr 12, 2015 1:10 pm

No need to bring snafu into the conversation....
It "sanctions" such a wide variety of tournaments that no rigorous statistical standard may be reached.... Let alone any other reservations....

(

happiness is the ignore button

)

Dr. Von Richten · Post by **Dr. Von Richten** » Sun Apr 12, 2015 7:40 pm

Digger Goreman wrote:No need to bring snafu into the conversation....

No need to bring your personal obsessions into the conversation either, but that never seems to stop you, does it?

Talk Fantasy Football

Necromantic vs Undead

Necromantic vs Undead

Re: Necromantic vs Undead

Re: Necromantic vs Undead

Re: Necromantic vs Undead

Re:

Re: Necromantic vs Undead

Re: Necromantic vs Undead

Re: Necromantic vs Undead

Re: Re:

Re: Necromantic vs Undead

Re: Necromantic vs Undead

Re: Necromantic vs Undead

Re: Necromantic vs Undead