Rather than a bigger field, what about....

Joemanji · Post by **Joemanji** » Fri Mar 27, 2015 4:44 pm

Or make the endzone 2 (or even 3 squares) deep so that receivers can loiter there without being instantly surfed.

MattDakka · Post by **MattDakka** » Fri Mar 27, 2015 6:30 pm

Joemanji wrote:Or make the endzone 2 (or even 3 squares) deep so that receivers can loiter there without being instantly surfed.

2 squares-deep endzone like in 2nd edition would be great... if you failed a gfi while trying to score you wouldn't risk to have the ball go out of bounds and thrown in.

plasmoid · Post by **plasmoid** » Sat Mar 28, 2015 11:42 am

Yeah. I'd love for the 2-square-endzone to return as well.
Cheers
Martin

Dr. Von Richten · Post by **Dr. Von Richten** » Wed Apr 01, 2015 8:57 pm

Darkson wrote:For example, if you make passing more important you're screwing over Lizards (who have no normal access to passing skills on top of all the other disadvantages they have).

Lizardmen have disadvantages?

JaM · Post by **JaM** » Fri Apr 03, 2015 6:49 am

Only the 'special' ones...

Talk Fantasy Football

Rather than a bigger field, what about....

Re: Rather than a bigger field, what about....

Re: Rather than a bigger field, what about....

Re: Rather than a bigger field, what about....

Re: Rather than a bigger field, what about....