From a BB perspective as well ... you'd need 4 Halflings to do this.kerrygray8 wrote:However, the idea that 2 Halflings could gang up and get a 1-dice Block against a BloodLetter is clearly laughable from a fluff perspective

Moderator: TFF Mods
From a BB perspective as well ... you'd need 4 Halflings to do this.kerrygray8 wrote:However, the idea that 2 Halflings could gang up and get a 1-dice Block against a BloodLetter is clearly laughable from a fluff perspective
I too will buy a box of Bloodletters. Any recommendations on figures for the rest of the team?Don__Vito wrote:I'm going to buy a box of Bloodletters tomorrow!
It's clear enough for me.galak wrote:b) Your complaint about the names of the 4 player positions. Heard. Understood. (and hopefully saying it that way is clear enough).
SlaunRew wrote:I too will buy a box of Bloodletters. Any recommendations on figures for the rest of the team?Don__Vito wrote:I'm going to buy a box of Bloodletters tomorrow!
Absolutely agree.Heff wrote:Lets face it, from a fluff perspective the team would arrive, kill the crowd,bath in their blood and stack their skulls on the pitch. Arguments that this or that doesn't fit the fluff are pointless as the whole bleedin TEAM doesn't fit the fluff anyway!
I wish we could, but those of us on the design team signed NDAs. I've only just been allowed to reveal the fact that I was on that team with Galak et al.I am so so interested in see the initial proposals to Cyanide, a bit of the team design story and considerations about what to do this and not that. If it is possible, BTW. I understand the privacy issues.
Figure discussion is over here: viewtopic.php?p=654162#p654162SlaunRew wrote:I too will buy a box of Bloodletters. Any recommendations on figures for the rest of the team?Don__Vito wrote:I'm going to buy a box of Bloodletters tomorrow!
This didn’t have to be a CPOMB roster, but a bash heavy team it certainly did. This is not that. The no mutations thing is fine really. But the rest is not Khorne. Even another CPOMB roster would have been fine, you keep telling us that CPOMB is fine after all. Fluff is the most important part of the process in team design. When I play with a roster it MUST feel like I am playing with that race. The races aren’t just graphics/models tagged on to a bunch of stats that have no correlation, this is what we have here though.GalakStarscraper wrote:As for the folks demanding this team be killer .... REALLY? We create another bash-tastic team with CPOMB access ... you'd all have strung me up by my nads
Well it certainly does that!!!GalakStarscraper wrote: my name should NEVER to be stamp of goodnesses. The product should speak for itself"
Not this! I think any number of people could come up with a better (as in more fitting) Khorne roster than this within a day. Heck I would be confident of producing 10 rosters in a day that fit khorne better than this.GalakStarscraper wrote:Fair enough ... what is a fluffy roster?Darkson wrote:Wrong. A fluffy roster I could have supported
Tom
Darkson wrote:Wrong. A fluffy roster I could have supported, even if designed for (what IMO) an inferior ruleset (just like I supported Underworld and the revamped Norse). This is insupportable - hell, it makes JJ's Chaos Pact look well-designed.GalakStarscraper wrote: The very addition of a Khorne roster no matter what it was would have generated the same posts you are now making whether a player committee helped or not.
Definitely, though it really didn’t need to be either or. It could have been fluffy and balanced without much thought. Designers were clearly so worried about making this too good, they just made it bland and uncompetitive at any TV. That’s ignoring the fluff aspect too.Darkson wrote:Maybe for powergamers. I prefer fluff and story to absolute balance, if absolute balance means we get given rubbish like this.SillySod wrote:One spoils the game. One does not.Darkson wrote:Broken and fluffy, or balanced and bland/unfluffy.
Not sure what's worse.
Easy choice.
Another good point, completely side stepped. He said Letter not thirster, and 4 flings should not be able to 1 dice a Thirster either for that matter.GalakStarscraper wrote:From a BB perspective as well ... you'd need 4 Halflings to do this.kerrygray8 wrote:However, the idea that 2 Halflings could gang up and get a 1-dice Block against a BloodLetter is clearly laughable from a fluff perspective
a) And who’s fault is it we ended up with said CPOMB mess? And now you fear making a killer team using the rules you are responsible for?GalakStarscraper wrote:
But a what I'm not getting here is the nay-sayers for the most part appear to be either A) asking for a massive ST 4/CPOMB roster (Which would have been openly dispised from the day it was shown by almost everyone) ... or B) asking for new skills which if realistic thought about before posting would be acknowledged were impossible.
But you clearly have ignored it, in no way shape or form does this look like a khorne roster. If you honestly think otherwise so you seriously deluded. I’m sure Khorne will be really happy to see his Diving Catch, Leaping, Side Step Daemons. Really fits what Khorne is all aboutGalakStarscraper wrote:And that is where we will agree to differ. At no point have I said I ignored fluff ... you did ... I'm not. I don't think we did ignore the fluff. So yes my friend we agree to disagree but at no point have I ever said I needed leeway. Those are your words ... not mine.Darkson wrote:I know you had your hands tied, but if you think that that gives you leeway to ignore fluff and then claim you did a great job....let's just say we beg to differ.