Difficult to choose what race to take to next tournament?

christer · Post by **christer** » Tue Jan 28, 2003 4:49 am

Try looking at the FUMBBL stats displaying what races manage best in a TR 100 vs TR 100 game.

What do you think, is that list representative?

And while you're there, go ahead and look at the other stats.. Lots of stuff there...

-- Christer

Darkson · Post by **Darkson** » Tue Jan 28, 2003 7:47 am

He's damn proud of his site, isn't he.

Don't blame him either. Nice work christer

Zombie · Post by **Zombie** » Tue Jan 28, 2003 8:00 am

Are these stats partly from third ed? If not, then why are the chaos dwarves ranking so low?

Grumbledook · Post by **Grumbledook** » Tue Jan 28, 2003 9:13 am

Its all brand new stats thats 5 weeks old all living rulebook as close as it can be.

The choas dwarfs are so low cause of the new coaches playing them for the first time. Thats all its down to, they will get more accurate when more data is collected as well, thus elimitating the coaches factor as much as possable. There aren't a lot of tr 100vs100 apart from brand new starting teams.

Post by **DoubleSkulls** » Tue Jan 28, 2003 9:56 am

I would have thought that Amazons in particular start off strongly, dodge across the board is damn useful when no one has tackle, and Norse not too far behind.

I'm also surprised that Nurgle's Rotters do so well when bog standard Chaos do badly, as I expected.

Grumbledook · Post by **Grumbledook** » Tue Jan 28, 2003 11:27 am

Like i said its down to the coaches ;] Had a lot of new players join recently.