Cakebowl 3, TOMCLARK WINS

[sann0638]

Hmm, might change for full stunty representation. Did Gary confirm skavenless underworld? Anyone taking stunty lizardmen? I will go underworld if someone else go lizards.

[mattwhile]

I think Loki is going stunty-Lizzies.

[Loki]

Yep, I am bringing Skinks, hence my question.

I don't know for sure that Halfings are in I but give the Stunty numbers I would be surprised if they wern't.

Hudson has confirmed that No Saurus Lizards are fine for Stunty, I would be surprised if no rats Underworld was a problem.

I have some Mutant Goblins if you need them.

D

[Hudson]

rat-less underworld ok for stunty

[mattwhile]

rat-less underworld ok for stunty

I assume that includes Star Player Rats?

[Loki]

Hudson, are you able to confirm if anyone is taking the plunge with Halflings?

[Loki]

rat-less underworld ok for stunty

I assume that includes Star Player Rats?

I find this an interesting question, I took 'Stunty' Underworld to ARBBL but had Glart; it didn't even cross my mind that would be a problem until lunchtime first day when someone asked the same question as above. The reason I didn't even think about it as I have seen loads of Flings with Zara, but by logical extension of the above questions would Halfings become non-stunty if they take Zara?

[Rubick]

I would say any legitimate stunty roster with at least 11 players is acceptable. Any star players you can take after that are fair game!

[mattwhile]

'Flings are always a stunty team, just like Ogres and Gobbos. Whichever stars they take it makes no difference. The underworld are not a stunty team, it's a condition that they include no Rats. I would assume that would include Star Player Rats. Same applies for Lizzies. Them taking Silibili would mean they were no longer counted as stunty because he's a Saurus.

[mattwhile]

I assume Hudson will chime in for this weekend, but going forward it would be nice to have a consensus opinion for all future tournaments that allow the other two teams to participate in the stunty cup.

[Gazza]

I took 'Stunty' Underworld to ARBBL but had Glart

So you'll be handing those Southern Stunty Cup Championship points back then?

[sann0638]

Could be something for Mr NAF tournament director to have an opinion on. Will add it to a list.

[Hudson]

Erm stunty, what are stunty teams, eerrrr no players with a strength below 3, errrrrrr big guys only, ermm whats bloodbowl. I'm not paid enough for this, whos Hudson..............................
What way is the Airport again?

I will review and update soon

[mattwhile]

[Loki]

I took 'Stunty' Underworld to ARBBL but had Glart

So you'll be handing those Southern Stunty Cup Championship points back then?

I feel no shame (the roster was submitted long before the day), and hopefully any ARBBL points will be mute as I win the Stunty Cups with Skinks (definitely no Saurus's anywhere) at Cake and Goblins at Gert

When described by Matt above the interpretation of no Saurus stars or no Rat stars makes perfect sense.

The way that I was interpeting it (and I am happy to accept either view from a TO) is that for both Lizards and Underworld you have your Big Guy, your Linemen and then the Stars and you don't have the other postionals i.e. Saurus or Skaven, rather than no Saurus or no Rats being the defining characteristic. As I said though this was definitely coloured by having seen non-stunties/non-big guys in Stunty teams.

So Mike, to expand the earlier offer I have mutant goblins and a Glart Smashrib Jr but you use him at your own peril