
Reconsidering the ruling on Khorne?
Moderator: TFF Mods
- Darkson
- Da Spammer
- Posts: 24047
- Joined: Mon Aug 12, 2002 9:04 pm
- Location: The frozen ruins of Felstad
- Contact:
Re: Reconsidering the ruling on Khorne?
It's chaos - the All-Stars won the Chaos Cup before they were formed, so of course it's your fault. 

Reason: ''
Currently an ex-Blood Bowl coach, most likely to be found dying to Armoured Skeletons in the frozen ruins of Felstad, or bleeding into the arena sands of Rome or burning rubber for Mars' entertainment.
- rolo
- Super Star
- Posts: 1188
- Joined: Wed May 27, 2015 9:38 am
- Location: Paradise Stadium, where the pitch is green and the cheerleaders are pretty.
Re: Reconsidering the ruling on Khorne?
I've played against Khorne in my Cyanide league many times. I've played one game with, and several against, in my local tabletop league. They're fun and challenging to play, and they're certainly beatable.
The crunch itself has never been a problem. Right now I'm looking at the bbligue stats, which shows 32% win, 20% tie, 48% loss for 1218 teams in 6168 matches. That's comparable to Underworld and Vampire - hardly overpowered.
Some coaches seem to have a problem with the fluff. Looks like some of the same folks complaining about it here as on the Cyanide forums. And it's true that some of the demons don't seem to exactly match the level of power that the units of the same name have in Warhammer. But that's hardly a reason to ban a team. Blood Bowl was never intended to be a 1:1 Warhammer conversion. There's no such thing as Underworld in Warhammer, for example. Most infantry units move at the same speed (or at least used to, haven't played Fantasy in a while). Blood Bowl is different sometimes.
Overall, we know that there are plenty of NAF coaches (myself included!) who would be happy to play Khorne at a NAF tournament if they were allowed. We know the team isn't even close to overpowered. The team would be a fun modelling and painting project, or I could buy https://www.indiegogo.com/projects/mk18 ... res#/story
And of course, there are plenty of coaches who hate the team for whatever reason and would never play them. That's fine. Nobody's holding a gun to their heads and forcing them to field a Khorne team. But I think the coaches who hate the team so much that they would ban everyone else from playing it are a minority.
If there were an NAF-wide poll on whether to allow Khorne at tournaments, I would vote yes with no second thoughts.
The crunch itself has never been a problem. Right now I'm looking at the bbligue stats, which shows 32% win, 20% tie, 48% loss for 1218 teams in 6168 matches. That's comparable to Underworld and Vampire - hardly overpowered.
Some coaches seem to have a problem with the fluff. Looks like some of the same folks complaining about it here as on the Cyanide forums. And it's true that some of the demons don't seem to exactly match the level of power that the units of the same name have in Warhammer. But that's hardly a reason to ban a team. Blood Bowl was never intended to be a 1:1 Warhammer conversion. There's no such thing as Underworld in Warhammer, for example. Most infantry units move at the same speed (or at least used to, haven't played Fantasy in a while). Blood Bowl is different sometimes.
Overall, we know that there are plenty of NAF coaches (myself included!) who would be happy to play Khorne at a NAF tournament if they were allowed. We know the team isn't even close to overpowered. The team would be a fun modelling and painting project, or I could buy https://www.indiegogo.com/projects/mk18 ... res#/story
And of course, there are plenty of coaches who hate the team for whatever reason and would never play them. That's fine. Nobody's holding a gun to their heads and forcing them to field a Khorne team. But I think the coaches who hate the team so much that they would ban everyone else from playing it are a minority.
If there were an NAF-wide poll on whether to allow Khorne at tournaments, I would vote yes with no second thoughts.
Reason: ''
-
- Ex-Mega Star, now just a Super Star
- Posts: 1420
- Joined: Thu Feb 09, 2012 3:12 pm
Re: Reconsidering the ruling on Khorne?
The Khorne roster, even if it was perfect, would never be allowed as it was released by Cyanide. The release of the steaming pile that is currently BB2 will only help condemn anything Cyanide ever does and increase the smugness from the other side of the BB divide
Oh and give Darkson plenty more reasons to carry on his hate affair with the company.

Reason: ''
- Valen
- Walking on the beaches...
- Posts: 8665
- Joined: Wed Sep 04, 2002 1:33 pm
- Location: Blackburn, Lancashire
Re: Reconsidering the ruling on Khorne?
Why can there not be a NAF vote of such a matter?
Reason: ''
-
- Super Star
- Posts: 1028
- Joined: Thu May 09, 2002 1:51 pm
- Location: Montreal, Quebec, Canada
Re: Reconsidering the ruling on Khorne?
For me it's simple: if it wasn't approved by the BBRC, it isn't approved.
I run a tourney where Khorne, unless approved by BBRC, will never be allowed.
Fred
I run a tourney where Khorne, unless approved by BBRC, will never be allowed.
Fred
Reason: ''
LQN Commissionner and now 7-time champion!
- Valen
- Walking on the beaches...
- Posts: 8665
- Joined: Wed Sep 04, 2002 1:33 pm
- Location: Blackburn, Lancashire
Re: Reconsidering the ruling on Khorne?
Got to say that is very small minded over you, you are aware the BBRC is dead right?
The Khorne roster has been play tested the feck out of it and there is absolutley nothing wrong with the roster apart from the fact the flulf isn't to some peoples taste, that is the ONLY issue as far as I can see from 14 pages of crap
The Khorne roster has been play tested the feck out of it and there is absolutley nothing wrong with the roster apart from the fact the flulf isn't to some peoples taste, that is the ONLY issue as far as I can see from 14 pages of crap
Reason: ''
-
- Super Star
- Posts: 1028
- Joined: Thu May 09, 2002 1:51 pm
- Location: Montreal, Quebec, Canada
Re: Reconsidering the ruling on Khorne?
I know BBRC is dead. The way it was «killed» isn't right in my view.
I'm a traditionnalist by nature. I absolutely hate change and I strongly believe that if it's not broken, don't fix it. I don't think LRB 6.0 is broken at all.
I play games (all games) with the rulesets they got and never liked experimental rules. I hate the Khorne roster. Hated every game I played against them. So narrow minded or not, they're not approved, so I won't allow them.
Heck, I wouldn't even play games against them in a tourney since those games wouldn't count towards my rating.
Fred
I'm a traditionnalist by nature. I absolutely hate change and I strongly believe that if it's not broken, don't fix it. I don't think LRB 6.0 is broken at all.
I play games (all games) with the rulesets they got and never liked experimental rules. I hate the Khorne roster. Hated every game I played against them. So narrow minded or not, they're not approved, so I won't allow them.
Heck, I wouldn't even play games against them in a tourney since those games wouldn't count towards my rating.
Fred
Reason: ''
LQN Commissionner and now 7-time champion!
- sann0638
- Kommissar Enthusiasmoff
- Posts: 6626
- Joined: Mon May 08, 2006 10:24 am
- Location: Swindon, England
Re: Reconsidering the ruling on Khorne?
Out of interest, what would your view be if the naf approved them? Would you play v them?
Reason: ''
NAF Ex-President
Founder of SAWBBL, Swindon and Wiltshire's BB League - find us on Facebook and Discord
NAF Data wrangler
Founder of SAWBBL, Swindon and Wiltshire's BB League - find us on Facebook and Discord
NAF Data wrangler
- Sandwich
- Star Player
- Posts: 559
- Joined: Tue Jan 26, 2010 4:36 pm
- Location: Godmanchester, UK
Re: Reconsidering the ruling on Khorne?
Out of interest, are Cyanide even putting Khorne in BB2?
Its a lot of clamour for a team which may not even be supported in a couple of weeks/months/years (or whenever the release date is now)
Its a lot of clamour for a team which may not even be supported in a couple of weeks/months/years (or whenever the release date is now)
Reason: ''
Stunty Cup: NAFC 2014, WISB IV
Most TDs: Cambridge Doubles 2011, Carrot Crunch VI, Boudica Bowl
Wooden Spoon: STABB Cup 2
Most TDs: Cambridge Doubles 2011, Carrot Crunch VI, Boudica Bowl
Wooden Spoon: STABB Cup 2
- Buggrit
- Ex-Mega Star, now just a Super Star
- Posts: 1442
- Joined: Thu Dec 22, 2005 2:38 pm
- Location: Leading the G.W.A. Nation!
Re: Reconsidering the ruling on Khorne?
Looks like they're putting Bretonnians in BB2 **Runs for Cover**
Reason: ''
-
- Super Star
- Posts: 1028
- Joined: Thu May 09, 2002 1:51 pm
- Location: Montreal, Quebec, Canada
Re: Reconsidering the ruling on Khorne?
I don't think it's NAF role to change the rules. And wasn't that vote already conducted?sann0638 wrote:Out of interest, what would your view be if the naf approved them? Would you play v them?
As far as playing them? We don't have the luxury of having 5-6 tourneys a week within driving distance of your place around here, so it's hard to say. But would I go to a tourney that has 3 khorne teams out of 12-16 (cause these are big tourneys around here)? Definitely not.
Fred
Reason: ''
LQN Commissionner and now 7-time champion!
-
- Super Star
- Posts: 1028
- Joined: Thu May 09, 2002 1:51 pm
- Location: Montreal, Quebec, Canada
Re: Reconsidering the ruling on Khorne?
Even though this team is more appealling to me, it's still not official.Buggrit wrote:Looks like they're putting Bretonnians in BB2 **Runs for Cover**
Reason: ''
LQN Commissionner and now 7-time champion!
- sann0638
- Kommissar Enthusiasmoff
- Posts: 6626
- Joined: Mon May 08, 2006 10:24 am
- Location: Swindon, England
Re: Reconsidering the ruling on Khorne?
I don't think there has been a vote. But I also wasn't suggesting NAF changing the rules, just asking the question.SBG wrote: I don't think it's NAF role to change the rules. And wasn't that vote already conducted?
Reason: ''
NAF Ex-President
Founder of SAWBBL, Swindon and Wiltshire's BB League - find us on Facebook and Discord
NAF Data wrangler
Founder of SAWBBL, Swindon and Wiltshire's BB League - find us on Facebook and Discord
NAF Data wrangler
- rolo
- Super Star
- Posts: 1188
- Joined: Wed May 27, 2015 9:38 am
- Location: Paradise Stadium, where the pitch is green and the cheerleaders are pretty.
Re: Reconsidering the ruling on Khorne?
There hasn't been a vote, only a decision which sounded to me a lot like waiting to decide how the team plays.
And for whatever reasons, gamers in general hate change. Not just Blood Bowl players, look at the whining whenever a new edition of D&D comes out. Or a new console. Or any game really.
I'm not trying to offend anyone here, I've done as much whining in my time as anyone else.
But I remember when Death Zone came out and the old-school second ed players were nearly screaming. Six new teams! They'll never let any of those in their league. "GW is just trying to make Warhammer with footballs!!". Those six teams were Wood Elves, Chaos Dwarves, Halflings, Undead, Goblin, Chaos. Would Blood Bowl really be better off without them?
Then a few years later, another supplement came out. With Norse, Amazons, Lizardmen. "OMG those teams are broken! I'll never let those in my league!". Now they are a standard part of Blood Bowl (although Norse have gone through a few revisions since then).
So my prediction is that eventually, Khorne will become sanctioned for NAF tournaments (at least as an optional team which the tournament organizer may ban). There will be a lot of bitching, and whining, and boycott threats ... and then it will die down and become no big deal.
(Then Cyanide will release Blood Bowl III in 2028, with a Stunty Leeg addon, and the sh*tstorm starts all over again)
And for whatever reasons, gamers in general hate change. Not just Blood Bowl players, look at the whining whenever a new edition of D&D comes out. Or a new console. Or any game really.
I'm not trying to offend anyone here, I've done as much whining in my time as anyone else.
But I remember when Death Zone came out and the old-school second ed players were nearly screaming. Six new teams! They'll never let any of those in their league. "GW is just trying to make Warhammer with footballs!!". Those six teams were Wood Elves, Chaos Dwarves, Halflings, Undead, Goblin, Chaos. Would Blood Bowl really be better off without them?
Then a few years later, another supplement came out. With Norse, Amazons, Lizardmen. "OMG those teams are broken! I'll never let those in my league!". Now they are a standard part of Blood Bowl (although Norse have gone through a few revisions since then).
So my prediction is that eventually, Khorne will become sanctioned for NAF tournaments (at least as an optional team which the tournament organizer may ban). There will be a lot of bitching, and whining, and boycott threats ... and then it will die down and become no big deal.
(Then Cyanide will release Blood Bowl III in 2028, with a Stunty Leeg addon, and the sh*tstorm starts all over again)
Reason: ''
- Valen
- Walking on the beaches...
- Posts: 8665
- Joined: Wed Sep 04, 2002 1:33 pm
- Location: Blackburn, Lancashire
Re: Reconsidering the ruling on Khorne?
Unless the NAF have changed the wording of their rules (I think it is on page three or four of this thread), it states only CRP teams are allowed. Slann, Pact and Underworld ae not in CRP.SBG wrote:Even though this team is more appealling to me, it's still not official.Buggrit wrote:Looks like they're putting Bretonnians in BB2 **Runs for Cover**
They are in Icepelt but not CRP. Which means those three are unofficial
Reason: ''