Negative winnings & Ageing

Scrappy Kid · Post by **Scrappy Kid** » Sat Oct 11, 2003 11:38 am

Munkey wrote:I like aging but one thing i've been considering changing is the -1 ST and AG to some combination of -1 MA and AV (and injuries also).

The reasoning is that -1 ST or AG is nearly always either instant dismissal (ie. might as well be dead) or completely ignorable (eg. -1 AG on a Black Orc, -1 ST on a Gutter Runner).

If -1 leads to instant dismissal too often what about -1/2 ST or AG ?

A player with 3.5 ST would make a D6 roll before the game , 1-3 ST3 for the game , 4-6 ST4.

Joemanji · Post by **Joemanji** » Sat Oct 11, 2003 11:42 am

Sounds a bit fiddly!

Joemanji · Post by **Joemanji** » Sat Oct 11, 2003 11:44 am

@Scrappy Kid

What's your sig from, by the way?

Oni · Post by **Oni** » Tue Oct 14, 2003 2:09 am

Istead of aging and negative winnings make a league for the higher TR teams. Or if there is going to be aging and negative winnings make them optional and the the leagues decide.

Oni

Grumbledook · Post by **Grumbledook** » Tue Oct 14, 2003 2:57 am

there are going to be rules implemented to keep the ratings down, its going to happen there is no choice in that

what we do have say on is how its done

and of course like any game you can play by what ever rules you want to

bit like drinking monopoly ;]

Oni · Post by **Oni** » Sun Nov 09, 2003 4:53 pm

Never tried drinking monopoly always stuck to dice games for that. Sounds like you have a good time with the drinking version though Grumble.

Oni