OGRE Teams ... TBB PLEASE VOTE
Moderator: TFF Mods
- Thadrin
- Moaning Git
- Posts: 8079
- Joined: Mon Jul 30, 2001 12:00 am
- Location: Norsca
- Contact:
I still can't stand the idea of there being a position called "thrower" on an ogre team, but seeing as I'm out of dead horses and seemingly alone on that one then there really is nothing else against number 2.
Reason: ''
I know a bear that you don't know. * ICEPELT IS MY HERO.
Master bleater. * Not in the clique.
Member of the "3 digit" club.
Master bleater. * Not in the clique.
Member of the "3 digit" club.
- GalakStarscraper
- Godfather of Blood Bowl
- Posts: 15882
- Joined: Tue Jun 26, 2001 12:00 am
- Location: Indiana, USA
- Contact:
JJ said he won't approve an Ogre team that starts with less than 11 players ... period. And its still his game.noodle wrote:Apart from it being nuffles sacred number, whats wrong with ogres starting with less than 11 players?

Galak
Reason: ''
-
- Legend
- Posts: 2732
- Joined: Thu Feb 13, 2003 11:08 pm
- Location: San Diego, CA, USA
- Contact:
- GalakStarscraper
- Godfather of Blood Bowl
- Posts: 15882
- Joined: Tue Jun 26, 2001 12:00 am
- Location: Indiana, USA
- Contact:
-
- Legend
- Posts: 2732
- Joined: Thu Feb 13, 2003 11:08 pm
- Location: San Diego, CA, USA
- Contact:
Because, even though there are hundreds of subscribers, there are, what, 40 to 50 people that post regularly? The rest are lurkers or old subscribers that never come here anymore.GalakStarscraper wrote:I'm going to bump this thread until I get at least 50 votes. I'll never understand how a forum with hundreds of subscribers cannot generate polls that exceed 75 votes ... sigh.
Galak
Chris
Reason: ''
At times like these I am reminded of the immortal words of Socrates, who said "... I drank what?"
- GalakStarscraper
- Godfather of Blood Bowl
- Posts: 15882
- Joined: Tue Jun 26, 2001 12:00 am
- Location: Indiana, USA
- Contact:
Yeah but Lurkers can vote without ever typing a word that why the polls have always confused me ... at least the polls where the results could actually be used to determine what the BB online folks want for game changes ... Melfaxis's What your Favorite X poll okay ... but some of these have been pretty important.BlanchPrez wrote:Because, even though there are hundreds of subscribers, there are, what, 40 to 50 people that post regularly? The rest are lurkers or old subscribers that never come here anymore.
Chris
Galak
Reason: ''
-
- Mr. Zlurpee
- Posts: 4898
- Joined: Sun Mar 23, 2003 9:00 pm
- Location: The Zlurpee Capital of the World, Indianapolis IN
- Contact:
But the larger number of people that participated in the poll would help to show the BBRC how big a portion of the community backs the idea. Just saying 80% of the people think this isn't going to work if only 10 people voted. but if you can say 80% of the people think this way of the 50 or more that participated in the poll then you have a valid point.
Reason: ''
- Thadrin
- Moaning Git
- Posts: 8079
- Joined: Mon Jul 30, 2001 12:00 am
- Location: Norsca
- Contact:
I think all of this is pretty much moot until someone gets them to lower the price on the ogres.
I want an ogre team, but a team of twelve ogres and three goblins comes in at 102 pounds, plus postage.
I want an ogre team, but a team of twelve ogres and three goblins comes in at 102 pounds, plus postage.
Reason: ''
I know a bear that you don't know. * ICEPELT IS MY HERO.
Master bleater. * Not in the clique.
Member of the "3 digit" club.
Master bleater. * Not in the clique.
Member of the "3 digit" club.
-
- Star Player
- Posts: 523
- Joined: Tue Jul 22, 2003 11:12 am
- Location: Linköping, Sweden
OK, I know it's too late to suggest other ogre teams, but I'll do that anyways. It can always serve as inspiration for discussion.
So here it is:
First remove the rule that say a team has to buy at least one fan factor (for all teams, not just the ogre team). This is the only rule change required. The team does not have any special rules.
The players in the teams are:
The only possible starting team is 7 ogres and 4 goblins with no apothecary, fan factor or re-rolls, which will give the team a very slow start, which I believe should compensate for the high amount of big players. I have only playtested this team in one-off matches (and it has lost every game), though.
So here it is:
First remove the rule that say a team has to buy at least one fan factor (for all teams, not just the ogre team). This is the only rule change required. The team does not have any special rules.
The players in the teams are:
Code: Select all
0-12 Ogres 120k (same stats as all other ogres)
0-4 Goblins 40k (same stats as all other goblins)
Re-rolls: 100k
Reason: ''
- GalakStarscraper
- Godfather of Blood Bowl
- Posts: 15882
- Joined: Tue Jun 26, 2001 12:00 am
- Location: Indiana, USA
- Contact:
Sorry David ... I ... welll .... I stopped reading right there.David Bergkvist wrote:So here it is:
First remove the rule that say a team has to buy at least one fan factor (for all teams, not just the ogre team). This is the only rule change required. The team does not have any special rules.
Galak
Reason: ''
- GalakStarscraper
- Godfather of Blood Bowl
- Posts: 15882
- Joined: Tue Jun 26, 2001 12:00 am
- Location: Indiana, USA
- Contact:
I have my entire Dragon Magazine collection going up for auction at a Game Convention in October along with some other stuff of mine. The proceeds of which the store is going to use to purchase me an Ogre team and a couple extra Throwers.Dark Lord wrote:Yeah, I'm not buying any ogres for awhile.
Galak
Reason: ''
- Munkey
- Ex-Mega Star, now just a Super Star
- Posts: 1534
- Joined: Fri Oct 25, 2002 12:31 am
- Location: Isle Of Wight, UK
- Contact:
Voted team 2 as it is by far the most balanced, but without wishing to ruin the party i'd rather not see an Ogre team at all.
To me the whole concept seems flawed, and I agree with Thadrin about the Thrower, what next Troll catchers
To me the whole concept seems flawed, and I agree with Thadrin about the Thrower, what next Troll catchers

Reason: ''
[size=75]The short answer is "no", but it is a qualified "no" because there are odd ways of interpreting the question which could justify the answer "yes".[/size]