Bribing the Ref

Got a great idea and/or proposal for BloodBowl?

Moderator: TFF Mods

Post Reply
User avatar
Shadow Monkey
Veteran
Veteran
Posts: 186
Joined: Wed Sep 17, 2003 1:26 am

Bribing the Ref

Post by Shadow Monkey »

Here's something else I've been using in my league.

Bribing the ref can be done in two ways.

1: It can be done in the Pre-Match Sequence during the Hire Freebooters, Wizards, and Star Players phase. It costs 10k for each call you wish the ref to ignore. (i.e. If you pay the ref 50k, the ref can catch you fouling or using secret weapons 5 times without being sent off the field). However, since you're paying the ref before the game even begins, he knows you're up to something, so he will have his eye on you from the beginning of the game. He wants you to get your money's worth after all. Your opponent gains a +2 bonus when rolling for the ref.

2: You can bribe the ref during the game as well. Whenever a player from your team gets caught fouling, your coach can argue with the ref. Normally, you would need to roll a 6 on a d6 to get the call reversed. If you fail this roll, you may grease the ref's palm with some money. The cost is equal to the difference between your roll, and the roll needed multiplied by 10k. (i.e. If you roll a 3 to argue the call, it will cost you 30k to get the call reversed. 30k gives you a +3 bonus to argue. 3 + 3 = 6)

Reason: ''
Two wrongs don't make a right. So why stop at just two?
Bredin
Rookie
Rookie
Posts: 12
Joined: Tue Nov 26, 2002 5:31 pm
Location: Melbourne

Post by Bredin »

Cool.

Looks like an excellent way for high TR teams to both shed TR and gain more advantage.

Just Say No.

Reason: ''
Freedom costs money.
Time = money.
Invest the time to get free.
Tim
Da Tulip Champ II
Posts: 3458
Joined: Wed Oct 16, 2002 4:18 pm
Location: Heidelberg, Germany
Contact:

Post by Tim »

I like it ...

I'm a bit confused about the pregame bribes at the +2 on the ref roll. IS that the +2 from IGMEOY (sent off on 4+ with eye on me) or an additional +2 on the ref roll (sent off on 2+ with eye on me). In the first case, i'd consider the bribe a bit cheap at 10k. and what happens if my opponent fouls back?

The ingame bribe is a very good rule though and not overpowered imo.

Reason: ''
Image
"In NUFFLE we trust!" - Retired Inquisitor of Nuffle.
Father of the Halfling Scribe
Admin of the Kurpfalz Cup
User avatar
Shadow Monkey
Veteran
Veteran
Posts: 186
Joined: Wed Sep 17, 2003 1:26 am

Post by Shadow Monkey »

The +2 is from the ref having his eye on you. Perhaps I shall limit it to 3 or 4 calls, or amybe just stick to the ingame bribes. If your opponent fouls back, you simply treat it as any other foul.

Reason: ''
Two wrongs don't make a right. So why stop at just two?
User avatar
Ivesy_boy
Experienced
Experienced
Posts: 154
Joined: Wed Oct 30, 2002 6:03 am
Location: Sydney

Post by Ivesy_boy »

But what happens to the ref's eye, when the eye is on you for the bribing, and he fouls you? do you both get it?

Reason: ''
User avatar
bluetooth
Star Player
Star Player
Posts: 725
Joined: Tue Mar 04, 2003 10:56 am
Location: Helsinki, Finland
Contact:

Post by bluetooth »

I like your idea, Shadow Monkey :D

BTW SMonkey, have you realized also that...
...two wrongs don't make a right, but three rights make a left ;)

Reason: ''
Nuffle Sucks!
Superior Heretic
Nuffle Blasphemer's Association
Winner of [url=http://www.hattrick.org/Common/default.asp]Hattrick[/url] Talk Blood Bowl Cup V, VI and VII
voyagers_uk
Da Cynic
Posts: 7462
Joined: Thu Jan 01, 1970 12:00 am
Location: Nice Red Uniforms and Fanatical devotion to the Pope!

Post by voyagers_uk »

maybe give the lesser TR team a discount on the bribes

Reason: ''
Image
Ikterus wrote: But for the record, play Voyagers_UK if you have the chance. He's cursed! :P
User avatar
Shadow Monkey
Veteran
Veteran
Posts: 186
Joined: Wed Sep 17, 2003 1:26 am

Post by Shadow Monkey »

But what happens to the ref's eye, when the eye is on you for the bribing, and he fouls you? do you both get it?
You mean when the ref fouls me, or his eye? :lol:

Ok, you bribe the ref, the ref has his eye on you from the start of the game. If your opponent fouls you and gets caught, the ref's eye goes to your opponent, just like if you had been caught fouling, and then your opponent then gets caught fouling. The ref's eye is on the last team to catch his eye, but he only has one eye to give. If he gave both teams an eye, he would have none left...unless he had some wyrd mutation, of course.

Reason: ''
Two wrongs don't make a right. So why stop at just two?
Post Reply