Discuss Fantasy football-style board games - GW's Blood Bowl, Impact!'s Elfball, Privateer Press' Grind, Heresy's Deathball, etc. THIS IS NOT AN NFL FANTASY FOOTBALL SITE!
I just wondered how the English (or any other) Eurobowl team is picked? I'm not getting delusions of granduer as I've not taken part in any tournaments yet just an interested observer.
Is it based on NAF rankings?
Cheers
Reason:''
[url=http://www.terranovagryphons.co.uk]Terra Nova Gryphons[/url]
There's no set way the teams are picked - it's up to the individual countries.
Iirc England's is pretty much based on those who've a) attended an overseas tournament, and b) willing to attend another. Germanyuse (or at least did) a set of qualifying tournaments. Scotland's is (iirc ) a) if you've got any Scottish blood at all (or even think you're Scottish) and b) willing to drive to the airport (catching plane is optional).
Reason:''
Currently an ex-Blood Bowl coach, most likely to be found dying to Armoured Skeletons in the frozen ruins of Felstad, or bleeding into the arena sands of Rome or burning rubber for Mars' entertainment.
it does all depend on the country. italy this year had the captain choose 4 names i think and the other 4 chosen from qualifying tournaments. the french, the danish was pretty much just the one league that came over i think.
Belgium had nine coaches that wanted to attend this year and in the end one decided to not be the ninth wheel on the wagon (thanks, Sam!) and so we were exactly eight.
What the coming editions will be for Eurobowl I have no idea, but if we get more than eight possible contestants I have no doubt that we will be able to sort everything out. That's after all what Belgian politicians do ...
The German version of qualifcation tournaments was a desaster in 2005. So we adopted the italian/republic of rome Version of an elected dictator for one year.
On the NAF Forum a possible team Captain is electetd whom several players are willing to follow. Then possible Players state their willingness and the teams they are good at.
And then the team captain decides whom he wants to choose and contacts them. So it is a chosen dictator for one year and the captain changes mostly every year.
The NAF Ranking is a good decisionbase at it states how much experience the coach has and on how many tournaments he was. But it is not the one and only decisionvalue.
So to make it short. Play some tournaments, show your value and you will be choosen. Putting a complete rookie in an eurobowl team is an risk a country takes only if it has no other options. As BloodBowl per se the eurobowl is not a tight, win only tournament. It is made of fun, friendship and challenges every game. Once you have been there you will never leave it out. But everyone likes to bring one of the trophies home.
To understand Eurobowl, from England's perspective at least, you have to go back to the first Eurobowl England attended in 2004.
One guy decided he wanted to form and captain an England team. Pretty much only 8 people were prepared to travel to Germany, so they were the 8 who formed the team.
Those 8 happened to win the event! It was felt the original team and captain should be given a chance to defend their title next time in 05. One of the 8 couldn't make it, so someone stepped in at short notice to fill in.
Next time in 2006, a captain was selected from the 8 original coaches. This individual (a very skilled and well-respected coach who had travelled to many tournaments in many different countries) selected the team on his own terms. The criteria were basically - coaches who had proven themselves by winning tourneys, having good NAF rankings etc, but also those who had contributed to the community and were committed 'team players'.
I was captain this year in Spain. I was chosen on an informal basis by current team members. I guess it was felt I was respected within the community, and that my position in the team in terms of gaming ability was unlikely to be challenged. I'd had the experience of playing Eurobowl before and of the other candidates from within the team, I was the most keen to do it.
So I chose the team, based on a number of factors - skill at the game, contribution to the community, commitment etc.
These are subjective criteria, the captain is in effect a dictator. But it's the captain's job to be as fair as possible and I think those who have captained England have tried to do just that. Other nations' qualification systems have not generally been succesful, so this remains the best way to do it IMO.
The captain has not yet been chosen for 2009. I would imagine it will again be an individual from within the team, a well-known face and an excellent coach. As others say if you want to be in the team - get to plenty of tournaments, play well, win some, and you have a great chance of catching the captain's eye!
There is the Welsh system, which is to continually, for over three years, go on about the need for coaches even a tiny bit Welsh, then hope you have enough in time for the tournament. It was so close to working this year!!!
By the way, you dont happen to have any Welsh grandparents do you?
(on that note, is it possible fo the Eurobowl to have a section in tbb all to itselt to assist with team creation/selection? Somewhere where a selection thread for each team can be stickied and not bumped off the front page over the year.)