Page 3 of 3
Re: Strengh of Schedule
Posted: Tue Sep 23, 2014 12:38 pm
by Loki
There's about 45 have done the 24, of those (again not 100%) I think there are 3 who have all 24 above 150: Geggster, Jimjimany and Solarflare. (In the interest of fair disclosure I think it's worth pointing out that Solarflare has only played one game with Vamps which doesn't change the facts but I think does take a slight shine of the 24>150.)
Info from
http://naf.talkfantasyfootball.org/prolific.html and NAF ranking
Apologies if I have missed anyone
Re: Strengh of Schedule
Posted: Tue Sep 23, 2014 1:16 pm
by sann0638
To return to the original question (sort of), there is a good debate going on over at Ausbowl about why there is a need to find a single winner. If the basic scoring system can't separate two people, it's because they are equally good...
Wouldn't work at some tournaments where a winner is a nice thing, but at smaller tournaments where it's basically a get together to play some games, having a shared winner might be the way to go.
Re: Strengh of Schedule
Posted: Wed Sep 24, 2014 5:55 am
by Moraiwe
sann0638 wrote:To return to the original question (sort of), there is a good debate going on over at Ausbowl about why there is a need to find a single winner. If the basic scoring system can't separate two people, it's because they are equally good...
Wouldn't work at some tournaments where a winner is a nice thing, but at smaller tournaments where it's basically a get together to play some games, having a shared winner might be the way to go.
Ha! Unsurprisingly, it was this thread that inspired me to start the Ausbowl one.