LRB 6.0
Posted: Tue Nov 17, 2009 7:50 pm
[information in this post deleted by request of GW legal]
The caveat?
Other than that. Great
Talk Fantasy Football
Discuss Fantasy football-style board games - GW's Blood Bowl, Impact!'s Elfball, Privateer Press' Grind, Heresy's Deathball, etc. THIS IS NOT AN NFL FANTASY FOOTBALL SITE!
https://www.talkfantasyfootball.org/
LRB 6.0
https://www.talkfantasyfootball.org/viewtopic.php?f=30&t=29228
Page 1 of 28
Posted: Tue Nov 17, 2009 7:53 pm
Uhm?
The caveat?
Other than that. Great
The caveat?
Other than that. Great
Posted: Tue Nov 17, 2009 7:54 pm
LOL, thinking the same thing.plasmoid wrote:Uhm?
The caveat?
Other than that. Great
Posted: Tue Nov 17, 2009 7:57 pm
Maybe there is no caveat...or maybe TFF aren't allowed to even show where the rules can be found...
Posted: Tue Nov 17, 2009 8:07 pm
It amazes me that GW's first thought isn't "hey. let's get some of these things sculpted!"
They are meant to be in the business of selling minis aren't they?
Said it before, will say it again: With such incredible business acumen, how on earth are they not financially ruined?
Also: Did the proposed Wood Elf catcher change get nixed? Shame if it did...
They are meant to be in the business of selling minis aren't they?
Said it before, will say it again: With such incredible business acumen, how on earth are they not financially ruined?
Also: Did the proposed Wood Elf catcher change get nixed? Shame if it did...
Posted: Tue Nov 17, 2009 8:07 pm
Necro overpowered!!! lol
Posted: Tue Nov 17, 2009 8:08 pm
Just teasing mate as you know but having read the caveat I am quite literally stunned by it.
Posted: Tue Nov 17, 2009 8:17 pm
Gotcha.Thadrin wrote:Also: Did the proposed Wood Elf catcher change get nixed? Shame if it did...
Thanks Tom.
Re: LRB 6.0 approved by Jervis (sorta)
Posted: Tue Nov 17, 2009 8:17 pm
Should that be turn 7 or 8? (or 7 or latter)..there is something missing there, as '7 for the half' doesn't quite make much senseGalakStarscraper wrote:.
Posted: Tue Nov 17, 2009 8:36 pm
Thank you for sharing this. Finally we know what the game will be fore many years.
When will there be a PDF version we can print?
Thank you
When will there be a PDF version we can print?
Thank you
Posted: Tue Nov 17, 2009 8:46 pm
ok.... that caveat is unbelievable.
I've been a loyal GW customer for over 20 years and have spent 1000's of pounds on their models, magazines, paints, books, tools and even T-shirts. With their attacks on the various Bloodbowl sites it almost seems they are trying to go out of their way to alienate veterans like me who love BB far more than GW ever have.
All that anti GW stuff i see here and on sites like warseer hadn't shaken my faith but it might be time to have a mass clear out and sell off. Then just buy models to paint (using non-GW paint supplies) for cash, though keeping it between mates before i get my own C&D.
The stupidity is amazing, once the rules are out there what can they actually do to stop people using these stars in leagues and non official tournaments?
If they don't want people to make rival BB models maybe they should release some models we actually need instead of a 3rd Griff or 2nd Zug.
Oh but i'm not going to start calling them Grandma Wendy as that sound really twee
I've been a loyal GW customer for over 20 years and have spent 1000's of pounds on their models, magazines, paints, books, tools and even T-shirts. With their attacks on the various Bloodbowl sites it almost seems they are trying to go out of their way to alienate veterans like me who love BB far more than GW ever have.
All that anti GW stuff i see here and on sites like warseer hadn't shaken my faith but it might be time to have a mass clear out and sell off. Then just buy models to paint (using non-GW paint supplies) for cash, though keeping it between mates before i get my own C&D.
The stupidity is amazing, once the rules are out there what can they actually do to stop people using these stars in leagues and non official tournaments?
If they don't want people to make rival BB models maybe they should release some models we actually need instead of a 3rd Griff or 2nd Zug.
Oh but i'm not going to start calling them Grandma Wendy as that sound really twee
Posted: Tue Nov 17, 2009 8:47 pm
this is all good news.
so with only GW hosting, can we link to it?
is it up on their site yet?
so with only GW hosting, can we link to it?
is it up on their site yet?
Posted: Tue Nov 17, 2009 8:54 pm
Good to see that there are no major changes. A shame that GW can't see fit to just produce the missing minis, but then we do have to thank them for the game in the first place.
Posted: Tue Nov 17, 2009 9:03 pm
so are Pact, Slann and Underworld officially part of it now? seeing as they weren't actually in the rules document itself...
Posted: Tue Nov 17, 2009 9:05 pm
They were not part of LRB 5.0+ so no they are not in LRB 6.0gonzolo wrote:so are Pact, Slann and Underworld officially part of it now? seeing as they weren't actually in the rules document itself...
They are BBRC endorsed (means the BBRC has voted 5-0 that they should be part of LRB 6.0) and they are NAF endorsed. GW won't put them in the rulebook due to miniature availability.
Galak