Could Blood Bowl replace Lord of the Rings?
Posted: Sat Jun 22, 2013 6:53 am
With the Hobbit not showing that much success over the last year I can't help but think the games days are numbered. In many ways it does the same thing as Warhammer but with an IP they don't own and have to pay for. I would be surprised if it lasts much beyond the last movie which will hopefully free up a gap in GW stores.
It is often suggested that the reason Blood Bowl was not supported was the fact that you only needed a few models to play and so didn't need to spend £100s on an army. That being said I'm sure that a Blood Bowl boxed game would out sell the Hobbit and by releasing boxes of plastic models that can cover two races I'm sure they would sell well. I do however think that it would run out of options to release quite quickly and after a couple of years be difficult to sustain.
It is often suggested that the reason Blood Bowl was not supported was the fact that you only needed a few models to play and so didn't need to spend £100s on an army. That being said I'm sure that a Blood Bowl boxed game would out sell the Hobbit and by releasing boxes of plastic models that can cover two races I'm sure they would sell well. I do however think that it would run out of options to release quite quickly and after a couple of years be difficult to sustain.