Shteve0 - I didn't mean to say that you were starting to talk stats, but if you read back then others were. I just thought, oh no, it's turning into that thread. But never mind.
I didn't get what you were saying with those lovely Banana Biscuits.
My thinking is that we're stuck with the statlines, and we have limited options when adjusting the fluff. I think puny 6337 bloodletters was one of the things that got the roster hated. And I don't think just calling them 0-4 Daemons (as Spubbbba(?) suggested) will solve it - because people will need models, not just abstract statlines. In short, I don't think we'll get closer to anyone's fluff-sense with Banana Biscuits

As for the furies, I know they're not an ideal fit. What is?
I strongly disagree that the team has to have Bloodletters. I don't think anything fits at all.
Thinking about it, nothing in the sacred 2nd ed. fluff has anything concrete on Khorne teams. With nothing in 2nd ed., we turn to Warhammer fluff, and apart from some BB players loving fluff from when they were teens themselves I don't see any sense in lining up with outdated fluff. So I don't see what prevents furies from being the daemons here.
In fact, sod the daemon theme.
The Nurgle Team was based on Nurgle's Rotters from BB fluff.
The Khorne Team could be based on Khorne's Killers.
Linemen, Furies, Khorngors, Daemon Prince. Sod bloodletters, herads, bloodthirsters, Khorne Juggers and whatnot.
Cheers
Martin