Page 1 of 1

Fumbling and interception

Posted: Sat May 31, 2003 8:55 am
by Colonel Fatlad
My gaming group and I have been trying to work out a sensible way around the problems we see with the rules for fumbling and interceptions. I realise that alot of people see them as providing game balance, but we find the following to be true:
i) rolling interceptions before finding out if the ball is fumbled just doesn't feel right.
ii) linking fumble chances to distance of throw also doesn't seem right.
iii) Ag5 players not being able to throw a missed pass is just wrong.

So, we've come up with a house rule. We now roll for fumble first. We started using a roll of (1+no. of tackle zones) as a fumble, but found that this tended to suck in rerolls as it's an extra dice roll. In the end we decided on simply the (no. of tackle zones). This means that throwers will only fumble when they are under pressure, which we like, and cut's down the extra dice rolls significantly. Obviously, it is now impossible to fumble on the pass dice roll itself. We are also considering adding 1 to the fumble roll for long bombs, if we find that it is now too easy to just throw the ball up-field when under-pressure.
This also allows two possible new skills to be used:
a) SAFE HANDS The player may reroll a failed fumble roll.
b) SACK If an opposing player is trying to pass out of this players tackle zone they must subtract 2 (or 1?) from the fumble roll.

Does anyone have any comments?

Re: Fumbling and interception

Posted: Sat May 31, 2003 10:43 am
by DoubleSkulls
Colonel Fatlad wrote:i) rolling interceptions before finding out if the ball is fumbled just doesn't feel right.
It doesn't feel right. A lot of leagues (mine included) roll for intercepts after the pass is thrown - so long as its not a fumble.
Colonel Fatlad wrote:ii) linking fumble chances to distance of throw also doesn't seem right.
It doesn't, but its a valuable game mechanic. By not including range modifiers in the chance of a fumble you downgrade the passing skills accurate & strong arm. A dedicated thrower ought to be more reliable than someone who is naturally agile.
Colonel Fatlad wrote:iii) Ag5 players not being able to throw a missed pass is just wrong.
There aren't too many AG 5 players out there.

Posted: Sat May 31, 2003 1:43 pm
by Grumbledook
Ag5 players can still fook up 1 in 6 times, specially the amount of double 1s i roll :/

Posted: Sat May 31, 2003 2:01 pm
by Dave
I agree with Ianwilliams here. And for a long bomb the thrower must try harder, more chances on dropping the ball somewhere halfway the movement of throwing

Posted: Sun Jun 01, 2003 12:03 am
by Shadow_Dragon
I think Pass roll, intercept roll then catch roll!

I have an Ag5 Gutter Runner he's damn sure getting pass block soon, wish i could give him long legs too.........!

But i didn't understand this bit!
"iii) Ag5 players not being able to throw a missed pass is just wrong. "

Posted: Sun Jun 01, 2003 12:30 am
by Snew
An AG5 player is either going to fumble (rolling a 1) or the pass is going to be accurate (2+). There's no chance of it being inaccurate.

Posted: Sun Jun 01, 2003 12:33 am
by Grumbledook
the fumble is practically the same as the missed pass considering how far away you are from the target

Posted: Sun Jun 01, 2003 1:01 am
by Shadow_Dragon
snotsngrots wrote:An AG5 player is either going to fumble (rolling a 1) or the pass is going to be accurate (2+). There's no chance of it being inaccurate.
OIC! i apologise for stupidity! :) But i concur, AG5 players are hard enough to get to justify the rewards!

Posted: Sun Jun 01, 2003 9:47 am
by Dave
My AG 5 players were the ball collectors. No amount of TZ was too much for them, sure hands, dodge and they could get the ball from anywhere to safety (Welfs that was)