Whereas airing your dirty laundry in public is tried and tested.VoodooMike wrote: The NAF's lack of transparency has always been one of its weaknesses - it is insular and opaque, and often accomplishes nothing noteworthy across a given election term. Doing everything behind closed doors, especially when the results affect people outside that closed room, does little to help demonstrate the relevance of the organization to those who question it.
...
I think the NAF should focus on cleaning up the dirt rather than pushing it under carpets lest outsiders realize it exists.
My point was that the NAF should, as you say, "focus on cleaning up the dirt" - however this is not the place for that discussion imo. Nor are we the NAF committee.