Page 2 of 6

Re: NAF must change

Posted: Mon Jun 19, 2017 1:22 pm
by Digger Goreman
Naf is Greedy W@nker's little dog and is only allowed to sit, beg and roll over.... Short leash and an anti-bark collar, dontcha know.... Toto will only do what it's told....

Re: NAF must change

Posted: Mon Jun 19, 2017 2:08 pm
by frogboy
Digger Goreman wrote:Naf is Greedy W@nker's little dog and is only allowed to sit, beg and roll over.... Short leash and an anti-bark collar, dontcha know.... Toto will only do what it's told....
Thats not very nice :(

Re: NAF must change

Posted: Mon Jun 19, 2017 2:24 pm
by Digger Goreman
frogboy wrote:
Digger Goreman wrote:Naf is Greedy W@nker's little dog and is only allowed to sit, beg and roll over.... Short leash and an anti-bark collar, dontcha know.... Toto will only do what it's told....
Thats not very nice :(
A truth is neither nice nor not nice....

Re: NAF must change

Posted: Mon Jun 19, 2017 3:16 pm
by lunchmoney
Thanks, Froggy. I have Digger on ignore so I don't have to see his vitriol and you go and quote him. :wink:

Re: NAF must change

Posted: Mon Jun 19, 2017 3:54 pm
by frogboy
lunchmoney wrote:Thanks, Froggy. I have Digger on ignore so I don't have to see his vitriol and you go and quote him. :wink:
Haha thats amazing. Now he will be able to see your posts too. I'm like an international intermediator...

:orc:

Re: NAF must change

Posted: Mon Jun 19, 2017 4:03 pm
by Valen
HAHAHAHA

Re: NAF must change

Posted: Mon Jun 19, 2017 4:14 pm
by Twelfman
lunchmoney wrote:Thanks, Froggy. I have Digger on ignore so I don't have to see his vitriol and you go and quote him. :wink:
Is there a site-wide way to implement this? Asking for a friend.

Re: NAF must change

Posted: Mon Jun 19, 2017 4:15 pm
by sann0638
frogboy wrote:
lunchmoney wrote:Thanks, Froggy. I have Digger on ignore so I don't have to see his vitriol and you go and quote him. :wink:
Haha thats amazing. Now he will be able to see your posts too. I'm like an international intermediator...

:orc:
Well, like Boris Johnson...

Re: NAF must change

Posted: Mon Jun 19, 2017 4:20 pm
by Loki
Why worry, all his posts say the same thing? The moment you see the 'ignored post' message you know what he's said anyway.

Re: NAF must change

Posted: Mon Jun 19, 2017 4:26 pm
by lunchmoney
Back on topic...
I've only seen this thread on NAF and here (seriously, why post in so many places with the full spiel rather than just once and link them?) and no one has "signed" it. Has anyone?

Re: NAF must change

Posted: Mon Jun 19, 2017 4:28 pm
by Gaixo
About two dozen people in the Spanish forum, last I looked.

Re: NAF must change

Posted: Mon Jun 19, 2017 5:17 pm
by lunchmoney
Not exactly massive numbers then...

Re: NAF must change

Posted: Mon Jun 19, 2017 10:50 pm
by Dark Duke
It's been 5 days since the post was opened in the Spanish Forum and there are 62 NAF coaches that have backed it there:

http://bloodbowlforo.org/phpBB3/viewtop ... 31&t=16957

Re: NAF must change

Posted: Mon Jun 19, 2017 11:35 pm
by Gaixo
A bit short of that once you throw out the proxy signatures and those that are signing with reservations. But still, maybe 50 former and current NAF members. Not a negligible amount, though it would be more impressive if they had made the effort to post outside their home forum. It's especially unfortunate that they'll (evidently) never see the responses to their requests.

Re: NAF must change

Posted: Tue Jun 20, 2017 12:41 am
by Shteve0
Personally I think you'd get a better response to this if you stuck to one or two issues. I think the fixed duration stable rulebook is a reasonable argument, but I can't see how that relates to allowing TOs to pick their own or whatever 4 and 5 are on about.