Page 6 of 18

Re: NAF Data for Number-Crunchers

Posted: Tue Mar 10, 2015 6:10 pm
by sann0638
Really? I thought the Shire? Or the moot, depending on your universe...

Re: NAF Data for Number-Crunchers

Posted: Tue Mar 10, 2015 6:21 pm
by sann0638
And in the meantime, here's the pre-2013 data. Just the 92,000 matches...

Will do a combined file later.

http://www.thenaf.net/wp-content/upload ... 03_12.xlsx

Re: NAF Data for Number-Crunchers

Posted: Tue Mar 10, 2015 7:14 pm
by sann0638
All the numbers, minus NAF names, countries and tournament names to make it all character-friendly!

http://www.thenaf.net/wp-content/upload ... educed.csv

Re: NAF Data for Number-Crunchers

Posted: Fri Jun 26, 2015 2:50 pm
by dode74
From what date are all the games LRB5?

Re: NAF Data for Number-Crunchers

Posted: Fri Jun 26, 2015 4:47 pm
by Darkson
Albion Coast 2006 (26/27-08-06) was the first LRB5 tournament. I think there might be a couple of LRB4 events after but not many.

Re: NAF Data for Number-Crunchers

Posted: Fri Jun 26, 2015 9:33 pm
by dode74
Yeah, I'd need to know exactly which ones were LRB5 games. Would be great if this were added as a ruleset column to the data.

Re: NAF Data for Number-Crunchers

Posted: Fri Jun 26, 2015 9:48 pm
by Darkson
You'd need to go through individual tournaments (threads, tournament entries on the NAF site and/or rule packs) for that info as its not recorded on the NAF site for record purposes.

Re: NAF Data for Number-Crunchers

Posted: Sat Jun 27, 2015 12:36 am
by Fassbinder75
Was LRB5 the golden age of Khemri? You can plot from individual results where their usage dropped like a stone after the nerf (2008 rules review?) but that's not really what you're looking for...

Re: NAF Data for Number-Crunchers

Posted: Sat Jun 27, 2015 6:42 am
by plasmoid
It is certainly important to know which ruleset is being used for the data to be useful.
Possibly all data after 2014 is very suspect, as tier-based rewards have become increasingly prolific.
Cheers
Martin

Re: NAF Data for Number-Crunchers

Posted: Sat Jun 27, 2015 5:08 pm
by dode74
Is it safe enough to suggest that the 2012/13 dataset is entirely LRB5?

Re: NAF Data for Number-Crunchers

Posted: Sat Jun 27, 2015 5:20 pm
by lunchmoney
dode74 wrote:Is it safe enough to suggest that the 2012/13 dataset is entirely LRB5?
I dont think so.
The first tourny I ran was in 2009 and I was using CRP/LRB6.

Re: NAF Data for Number-Crunchers

Posted: Sat Jun 27, 2015 5:50 pm
by dode74
Other way around - I was asking if the entirety of that dataset was LRB5 rather than whether that dataset was the entirety of the LRB5 stuff. I'd rather have an untainted but smaller sample.

Re: NAF Data for Number-Crunchers

Posted: Sat Jun 27, 2015 6:16 pm
by Darkson
I think you'd be safe to say that from 2010 onwards is LRB5/CRP. Maybe ask Lycos and/or pipey when the NAF tournament rules were changed to only allow events to use the current rule set.

Re: NAF Data for Number-Crunchers

Posted: Sat Mar 19, 2016 9:12 pm
by mubo
Mike- any chance of the data up to 2016?

Re: NAF Data for Number-Crunchers

Posted: Sat Mar 19, 2016 10:25 pm
by sann0638
Will see what I can do.