Talk Fantasy Football

Well with that info it appears that i finished 135th instead of 134th still not a bad outting for a team made-up of nothing but players with the stunty skill

The points reductions were a joke!

ambush3 wrote:The points reductions were a joke!

I heard someone got a points reduction for not writing 'loner' on their roster for a troll or something. Think that's a shame- enforcing rules that strictly might put new players off coming next time.

I can't honestly remember doing that one (not saying it didn't happen, just that I don't recall it) - we did check ones where people hadn't written skills on their handed in copy, which we checked with them AND their opponent to make sure they'd been using it (Hudson and his Frenzy-less Snow Troll for example), and they didn't get deductions. The 4 or 5 coaches that had MV9 WE catchers, and the guy that had 30k skellies deserved theirs.

But yeah, I think a less heavy-handed approach would have been better, but that's the rules they want to work with.

HA That makes it even more of a joke!

Mates rates and all!

I didn't actually have to speak to any of the GW staff after registration. But everything I heard about them was negative. Frazer's penalty was an utter joke. And what the guy said to Jimmy was ridiculous. People being patronising whilst at the same time not knowing what they are doing is one of my all time peeves.

Well done paul and geoff! there were a few issues, but overall it was a fantastic event as it always is. Hopefully feedback will be taken on board but regardless I'll be back next year.

What was said to Jimmy, and what did the GW refs do? Answers on a PM, to...

Joemanji wrote:People being patronising whilst at the same time not knowing what they are doing is one of my all time peeves.

Hee hee. I did this in the queue, questioning someone's lizardman roster having never played with them, who went on to go 4-2-0. Hopefully I wasn't too annoying about it though, just trying to be helpful!

Here we go:






Good luck with reading them - might need to download, zoom, or somesuch. Best I could do!

Mike

Thanks Mike, but the quality is too low to be able to read them!

Can you change the scan resolution up to 300dpi?

agreed. choose gray scale and 600dpi.
Also try scanning each page in two halves so the 800px limit on this forum is the width of each image rather than Its height.

If no-one's done it by the time I get back tonight (a certain Martin is going to try and teach the ARBBL boys how to play Warmachine!) I'll scan it and host it somewhere, and put a link up.

lunchmoney wrote:

Thadrin wrote:How many "Galak" teams?

In no particular order......
Galaktic Wrongdoing
Lost Anglian Galaktico's
Galak's Grudge Bearers
Galak's Bashers
Galak's Daddies
Galak's Grinders
Necromonicus Galakticus
The Pan Galaktic Gargle Blasters
Boys of Galak
Boom Galak-lak Boom
Galak's Maulers
Galak's Mummies 6.0
Galaktagogoues
Genisis of the Galaks
Galak's Granny Bashers
FruGAL AKtionists

My official thank you and warm thoughts from my heart to everyone who did this small protest.

Galak