No I'm not. Well.. as long as I winneoliminal wrote:I'm confused. Did you plan on being a bad sport?
Well if Anthony brings his Norse and if the gentlman from my league brings his norse, my team will look like it was painted by a four year old That's not to say I don't think they should bring their teams. On the contrary because I want to play against them. They do amazing work that I couldn't hope do duplicate in 10 years of trying. I just don't think it's fair to compare paint jobs for overall winner.neoliminal wrote:Since your "substandard" paint job will probably be going up against other substandard paint jobs, you'll likely gather about average points.
The only problem with that theory is that everyone has to be fair in judging their opponents. IMO that's open to a lot of abuse. Say someone wanted be be a real a$$ and gave everyone he played minimum points for both sportsmanship and painting. You can't argue against it, you've asked for his judgement. If his judgement is that he is better than everyone there....neoliminal wrote:Remember that it's your opponents who are ranking your painting... not a judge. They will be ranking your team against the other 3 teams they played. If yours is better painted than those other three guys, you'll get the top points from that player.
Personally I'd vote for TD's then casualties. Just because someone is a good sport doesn't mean they are a good coach.neoliminal wrote:What would you rather have as the tie breaker, Sportsmanship or TD's? Personally I pick sportsmanship.