Catch roll vs roll to catch vs attempt to catch

Don't understand a particular rule or just need to clarify something? This is the forum for you. With 2 of the BBRC members and the main LRB5/6 writer present at TFF, you're bound to get as good an answer as possible.

Moderator: TFF Mods

JPS
Experienced
Experienced
Posts: 91
Joined: Fri Jan 26, 2007 11:25 am

Catch roll vs roll to catch vs attempt to catch

Post by JPS »

Are the phrases "catch roll", "roll to catch", and "attempt to catch" equivalent? And is this true for all other roll types, like dodge, pick up, pass, etc?

The specific instances of contention were that:
  • 1) the Catch Skill could not be used on an attempt to catch a bouncing ball because the skill says you can re-roll a "catch roll" which only applies to catching a pass (We ruled, I believe correctly, that the skill could be used), and;

    2) a failed pick-up roll which caused the ball to bounce to, and be caught by, another player on the same team did not cause a turnover. (We ruled that a turnover was not caused, but found ourselves to be incorrect after consulting this forum. Woohoo TFF!)
I am less concerned with the specific events described above than I am with the general principle that phrases like "catch roll" and "dodge roll" are equivalent to "roll to catch" and "attempt to dodge" respectively. I believe they are equivalent, but would like to go back to my league commissioner with support from the TFF forum. Of course, whatever the league commissioner ultimately decides overrules everything else, as always.


Note: This question does not apply to the distinction between "block" with lower case b and "Block Action" with capital B. This distinction has not caused a problem, but may be leading my league-mates to over-interpret other rules.

Reason: ''
User avatar
GalakStarscraper
Godfather of Blood Bowl
Posts: 15882
Joined: Tue Jun 26, 2001 12:00 am
Location: Indiana, USA
Contact:

Re: Catch roll vs roll to catch vs attempt to catch

Post by GalakStarscraper »

rolling to catch is the same as a Catch roll.

You can use the Catch skill for all of the following:

1) Pass from a team-mate
2) Interception roll
3) Hand-off from a team-mate or opponent
4) Bomb catch
5) Throw-in that lands in your square
6) Bouncing ball that lands in your square
7) Kick-off that lands in your square

If you have Diving Catch than #1, #5, and #7 apply to balls landing in a square adjacent to you as well.

Tom

Reason: ''
Impact! - Fantasy Football miniatures and supplies designed by gamers for gamers
Image
Fist of Gales
Experienced
Experienced
Posts: 133
Joined: Sat Jan 12, 2008 3:09 pm

Re: Catch roll vs roll to catch vs attempt to catch

Post by Fist of Gales »

2) a failed pick-up roll which caused the ball to bounce to, and be caught by, another player on the same team did not cause a turnover. (We ruled that a turnover was not caused, but found ourselves to be incorrect after consulting this forum. Woohoo TFF!)
I thought a failed pick up roll was on the list of turn overs?

Reason: ''
User avatar
Grumbledook
Boy Band Member
Posts: 10713
Joined: Sat Sep 21, 2002 6:53 pm
Location: London Town

Re: Catch roll vs roll to catch vs attempt to catch

Post by Grumbledook »

It is, hence why he said they were incorrect to play it as though it didn't.

Reason: ''
JPS
Experienced
Experienced
Posts: 91
Joined: Fri Jan 26, 2007 11:25 am

Re: Catch roll vs roll to catch vs attempt to catch

Post by JPS »

@Fist of Gales, Grumbledook
Fist of Gales wrote:I thought a failed pick up roll was on the list of turn overs?
It is. The argument was that the "pickup attempt" was not limited to the one pickup roll, but included all of the subsequent rolls to catch the bouncing ball. The pickup roll failed. The ball bounced to an opposing player who failed to catch it. The ball then bounced back to the player who had attempted to pick up the ball who now caught the bouncing ball. It was ruled - incorrectly - that this was part of the attempt to pick up the ball and the team could continue the turn.

Basically, the commissioner ruled that "pickup attempt" did not equal "pickup roll."

The correct ruling should have been:
The pickup roll has failed, causing a turnover. Resolve the bouncing ball using catch roll(s).

@Galakstarscraper
Thanks for the clear and concise answer, Tom.
rolling to catch is the same as a Catch roll
Just to be clear, this also applies to dodge, pick-up, intercept, etc, correct?

- JPS

Reason: ''
User avatar
GalakStarscraper
Godfather of Blood Bowl
Posts: 15882
Joined: Tue Jun 26, 2001 12:00 am
Location: Indiana, USA
Contact:

Re: Catch roll vs roll to catch vs attempt to catch

Post by GalakStarscraper »

JPS wrote:
rolling to catch is the same as a Catch roll
Just to be clear, this also applies to dodge, pick-up, intercept, etc, correct?

- JPS
Yes.

Reason: ''
Impact! - Fantasy Football miniatures and supplies designed by gamers for gamers
Image
slup
Star Player
Star Player
Posts: 682
Joined: Tue Feb 11, 2003 3:43 pm
Location: Copenhagen, Denmark
Contact:

Re: Catch roll vs roll to catch vs attempt to catch

Post by slup »

GalakStarscraper wrote:rolling to catch is the same as a Catch roll.

You can use the Catch skill for all of the following:

1) Pass from a team-mate
2) Interception roll
3) Hand-off from a team-mate or opponent
4) Bomb catch
5) Throw-in that lands in your square
6) Bouncing ball that lands in your square
7) Kick-off that lands in your square

If you have Diving Catch than #1, #5, and #7 apply to balls landing in a square adjacent to you as well.

Tom
1) Pass from a team-mate or opponent :)

Reason: ''
Licensed Rules Lawyer
Smurf
mattgslater's court jester
Posts: 1480
Joined: Wed Nov 25, 2009 6:39 pm
Location: Bristol

Re: Catch roll vs roll to catch vs attempt to catch

Post by Smurf »

I have a problem with this interpretation of the rules.

bouncing balls require surehands.

If the ball is scattered eg after kick off, after throw in after flubbed pass, the skill to catch it is catch.

But as soon as it hits the floor, ie it bounces, then it is surehands. but that's the way I see it because catch has too many uses as it is.

Reason: ''
The Scrumpers (Wood Elf)
Timog (Chaos Dwarves)
Cursed Crypt (Khemri)
Fur Fur Furious (Skaven)
User avatar
Grumbledook
Boy Band Member
Posts: 10713
Joined: Sat Sep 21, 2002 6:53 pm
Location: London Town

Re: Catch roll vs roll to catch vs attempt to catch

Post by Grumbledook »

you care catching a bouncing ball not picking it up

you can house rule it if you want but that is how it is meant to be

sure hands already has has two parts picking up and negating strip ball

catch just catches

Reason: ''
User avatar
GalakStarscraper
Godfather of Blood Bowl
Posts: 15882
Joined: Tue Jun 26, 2001 12:00 am
Location: Indiana, USA
Contact:

Re: Catch roll vs roll to catch vs attempt to catch

Post by GalakStarscraper »

Smurf wrote:I have a problem with this interpretation of the rules.

bouncing balls require surehands.
Incorrect. Sure Hands only works on balls that are at rest not in motion.

Galak

Reason: ''
Impact! - Fantasy Football miniatures and supplies designed by gamers for gamers
Image
Smurf
mattgslater's court jester
Posts: 1480
Joined: Wed Nov 25, 2009 6:39 pm
Location: Bristol

Re: Catch roll vs roll to catch vs attempt to catch

Post by Smurf »

Ok you have convinced me.

Going to have to right a crib sheet.

Just means that Cathers have got an easy time sometimes.

Reason: ''
The Scrumpers (Wood Elf)
Timog (Chaos Dwarves)
Cursed Crypt (Khemri)
Fur Fur Furious (Skaven)
slup
Star Player
Star Player
Posts: 682
Joined: Tue Feb 11, 2003 3:43 pm
Location: Copenhagen, Denmark
Contact:

Re: Catch roll vs roll to catch vs attempt to catch

Post by slup »

Smurf wrote:Just means that Cathers have got an easy time sometimes.
As long as the catcher is not caught by an opponent.

Reason: ''
Licensed Rules Lawyer
JPS
Experienced
Experienced
Posts: 91
Joined: Fri Jan 26, 2007 11:25 am

Re: Catch roll vs roll to catch vs attempt to catch

Post by JPS »

slup wrote:
Smurf wrote:Just means that Cathers have got an easy time sometimes.
As long as the catcher is not caught by an opponent.
Yeah! *squish* Oops.

Reason: ''
Gimli
Experienced
Experienced
Posts: 108
Joined: Sun Aug 24, 2008 5:55 pm
Location: North Vancouver, British Columbia

Re: Catch roll vs roll to catch vs attempt to catch

Post by Gimli »

GalakStarscraper wrote:rolling to catch is the same as a Catch roll.

You can use the Catch skill for all of the following:

1) Pass from a team-mate
2) Interception roll
3) Hand-off from a team-mate or opponent
4) Bomb catch
5) Throw-in that lands in your square
6) Bouncing ball that lands in your square
7) Kick-off that lands in your square

If you have Diving Catch than #1, #5, and #7 apply to balls landing in a square adjacent to you as well.

Tom
Does the +1 Diving Catch modifier also apply to Handoffs and Interceptions?

Reason: ''
User avatar
daloonieshaman
Legend
Legend
Posts: 2103
Joined: Tue Jun 07, 2005 11:58 pm
Location: Pasadena California
Contact:

Re: Catch roll vs roll to catch vs attempt to catch

Post by daloonieshaman »

interceptions NO
Handoff yes as it is an accurate pass

Reason: ''
Image
2014 Chaos Cup Stunty Cup
Post Reply