Re: 2016 Star Players
Posted: Wed Jun 28, 2017 8:13 am
I think Stars is one of the areas the new rule set is getting right so far. (aside from Grak and Crumbleberry)
One of my criticisms of CRP was that the stars were mostly pointless/useless. Either costing too much to bother with of having dreadful skill sets.
The stars so far in 2016 edition have all been good quality both skill set and cost wise, and well worth considering if you have the money to spend on them. So personally I couldn't give a monkeys if the crp star list was scrapped. We are also getting models for them all which is great!!!
My only concern is that we will end up with a 3rd ed type situation in which some teams have 6 stars others only have 1 or 2. We need parity for all teams. It doesn't have to be 6 stars each. Even 3 each would suffice. But each race should have the same number of stars to select from by the end of the run of death zones.
One of my criticisms of CRP was that the stars were mostly pointless/useless. Either costing too much to bother with of having dreadful skill sets.
The stars so far in 2016 edition have all been good quality both skill set and cost wise, and well worth considering if you have the money to spend on them. So personally I couldn't give a monkeys if the crp star list was scrapped. We are also getting models for them all which is great!!!
My only concern is that we will end up with a 3rd ed type situation in which some teams have 6 stars others only have 1 or 2. We need parity for all teams. It doesn't have to be 6 stars each. Even 3 each would suffice. But each race should have the same number of stars to select from by the end of the run of death zones.